首页> 外文期刊>The World Economy >Assessing the Benefits to Developing Countries of Liberalisation in Services Trade
【24h】

Assessing the Benefits to Developing Countries of Liberalisation in Services Trade

机译:评估服务贸易自由化对发展中国家的利益

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This paper both discusses the potential impacts of services trade liberalisation on developing countries and reviews existing quantitative studies. Its purpose is to distill themes from studies rather than to advocate policy change. The picture that emerges is seemingly one of valiant attempts to quantify in the presence of formidable analytical and data problems. The basic intuition seems to be that with genuine two-sided (OECDon-OECD) liberalisation in services that are seemingly considerably labour intensive, the potential may be there for significant developing country gains. This position is seemingly not endorsed by studies, neither is it contradicted. One difficulty with existing studies is that the conceptual underpinnings of trade in services and how analytically this trade differs from trade in goods, if at all, needs to be sorted out before impacts on developing countries are discussed. Key here are mobility issues for service providers (both firms and workers), and the functional treatment of individual service items (banking, insurance, telecoms, etc.). Recent analytical work suggests that liberalisation in these service items need not always yield gains. The discussion and measurement of barriers to service trade is also problematic. One is talking of domestic regulation, entry barriers, portability of providers and competition policy regimes, more so than barriers at national borders as with tariffs. Both representing and quantifying barriers raise major difficulties, and these are spelled out.
机译:本文既讨论了服务贸易自由化对发展中国家的潜在影响,也回顾了现有的定量研究。其目的是从研究中提炼主题,而不是主张政策改变。出现的情况似乎是在存在巨大分析和数据问题的情况下进行量化的英勇尝试之一。基本的直觉似乎是,在服务方面真正真正的双边(经合组织/非经合组织)自由化看来似乎是劳动密集型的,因此可能存在显着的发展中国家收益的潜力。这个立场似乎没有得到研究的认可,也没有矛盾。现有研究的一个困难是,在讨论对发展中国家的影响之前,必须先弄清服务贸易的概念基础,以及从理论上讲这种贸易与货物贸易有何不同。这里的关键是服务提供商(公司和工人)的流动性问题,以及各个服务项目的功能处理(银行,保险,电信等)。最近的分析工作表明,这些服务项目的自由化并不一定总能带来收益。服务贸易壁垒的讨论和衡量也存在问题。一种是谈论国内监管,进入壁垒,提供者的可携带性和竞争政策制度,而不仅仅是关税方面的国界壁垒。代表障碍和量化障碍都带来了重大困难,这些都已阐明。

著录项

  • 来源
    《The World Economy》 |2004年第8期|p.1223-1253|共31页
  • 作者

    John Whalley;

  • 作者单位

    The University of Western Ontario;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 f;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号