首页> 外文期刊>Work, Employment and Society >Does adult education contribute to securing non-precarious employment? A cross-national comparison
【24h】

Does adult education contribute to securing non-precarious employment? A cross-national comparison

机译:成人教育是否有助于确保非稳定就业?跨国比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The objective of this article is to analyse the effect of acquiring a new formal qualification as an adult (measured as an upgrade or a side-step) on the likelihood of being in non-precarious employment. Three countries with similar longitudinal datasets are compared: Spain, the UK and Russia. The results indicate that adult education is beneficial in the three countries; with differences, however, depending on the definition of precarious employment used and the (previous) employment status of individuals. The findings suggest that the differences among countries are related to different labour market structures: adult education has a clearer beneficial impact on accessing and remaining in non-precarious employment in more flexible employment systems than in more rigid insider-outsider economies, where labour trajectories are strongly determined by what happens during the first years after school.
机译:本文的目的是分析获得成年新的正式资格(作为升级或回避措施衡量)对从事不稳定职业的可能性的影响。比较了三个具有相似纵向数据集的国家:西班牙,英国和俄罗斯。结果表明,成人教育对这三个国家都是有益的。但是,这取决于所使用的不稳定就业的定义和个人(先前)的就业状况。研究结果表明,国家之间的差异与劳动力市场结构的不同有关:与劳动力市场较为僵化的内外经济体系相比,成人教育对更不稳定的就业体系而言,对不稳定就业的获取和留存产生明显的有利影响。强烈取决于放学后头几年的情况。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号