首页> 外文期刊>Wissenschaftsrecht >Wert der Wissenschaft - was darf Wissenschaft?
【24h】

Wert der Wissenschaft - was darf Wissenschaft?

机译:科学的价值-科学能做什么?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The value of science is evident. It is impossible not to imagine its existence in a world that has also been formed by human knowledge. The state respects the autonomy of science and promotes it. Within a highly differentiated economy, the financial support of the state makes possible the availability of scientifically educated holders of professional qualifications. The state adopts the regulations of the state of knowledge for order purposes without however having the right to judge on the scientific truths within. The value of science is one of those truths that are "self evident". The limits of science are only partly confirmed by such evidence. As such even "ethics" are not an inherent barrier to academic freedom. The modern state guarantees ethical basic requirements through the protection of legal interests. The access to third parties' legal interests without consent lies outside the are of academic freedom from the outset. The same applies to so-called scientific work that does not comply with the rules that serve as a (relative) guarantee of correctness. Furthermore, the regulations of the general legal system provide for the necessary protection of research that is not privileged in that respect. The ambivalence of the knowledge that is gained through research is subject of the legislative obligation to protect and is no reason to limit the enhancement of scienctific knowledge.%Das Thema weist eine gewissermaßen klassische Dualität auf. Gefragt ist nach dem Wert der Wissenschaft und deren Grenzen. Ich werde dem ersten Aspekt eine knappe Reflektion widmen; das Hauptaugenmerk werde ich auf die Grenzen richten.
机译:科学的价值是显而易见的。不可能不想象它存在于人类知识形成的世界中。国家尊重并促进科学的自主性。在高度差异化的经济中,国家的财政支持使获得受过科学教育的专业资格持有者成为可能。国家出于秩序目的采用知识状态的规定,但无权对内部的科学真理作出判断。科学的价值是“显而易见的”真理之一。这样的证据只能部分地证明科学的局限性。因此,甚至“道德”也不是学术自由的固有障碍。现代国家通过保护法律利益来保证道德基本要求。从一开始,未经许可就无法获得第三方的合法权益。这同样适用于不符合作为(相对)正确性保证的规则的所谓科学著作。此外,一般法律制度的规定对在这方面没有特权的研究提供了必要的保护。通过研究获得的知识的矛盾性是保护法律的义务,而没有理由限制科学知识的增长。 Gefragt ist nach dem Wert der Wissenschaft und deren Grenzen。 Ich werde dem ersten Aspekt eine knappe反射寡妇;格林森(Grenzen)丰富起来。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号