Comments on “Coverage Analysis of Multiuser Visible Light Communication Networks”

摘要

We show that two point processes (Phi) over tilde (eq) and (Phi) over tilde (eq2), which were claimed by Yin and Haas to be equivalent in terms of their signal-to-interference-plus-noise ratio (SINR), are, in fact, not SINR equivalent. We discuss the importance of this distinction and explain how the correction impacts the results derived in the original paper.