...
首页> 外文期刊>Weed technology >Postemergence Weed Control in Soybean (Glycine max) with Cloransulam-Methyl and Diphenyl Ether Tank-Mixtures
【24h】

Postemergence Weed Control in Soybean (Glycine max) with Cloransulam-Methyl and Diphenyl Ether Tank-Mixtures

机译:含氯兰舒兰-甲基和二苯醚混合罐的大豆(大豆最大)出苗后杂草控制

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Field studies were conducted in 1995 and 1996 at three locations in North Carolina to evaluate weed control and soybean injury with postemergence (POST) treatments of cloransulam-methyl alone or in tank-mixture with acifluorfen, fomesafen, or lactofen compared with a commercial standard of acifluorfen plus bentazon. Soybean injury was 2 to 3% 7 d after treatment with cloran-sulam-methyl applied alone and 11 to 46% when applied with fomesafen, lactofen, acifluorfen, or acifluorfen plus bentazon. Cloransulam-methyl applied alone controlled 95% of entireleaf morning-glory and ivyleaf morningglory. Control was not increased by the addition of acifluorfen, fomesafen, or lactofen. Cloransulam-methyl improved the control of common lambsquarters to at least 81% compared with dimethenamid applied preemergence alone (69% control). All diphenyl ether herbicide treatments controlled common lambsquarters at least 91%. Prickly sida control by cloransulam-methyl ranged from 14 to 73% 8 wk after treatment. Control of prickly sida was varied by diphenyl ether herbicides (73 to 100% control). Tank-mixtures of cloransulam-methyl + fomesafen and clor-ansulam-methyl + acifluorfen increased the control of prickly sida over either herbicide applied alone. Soybean yield was greater for all tank-mixtures than for any diphenyl ether herbicide or for cloransulam-methyl treatment applied alone. But only the acifluorfen + cloransulam-methyl treatment had higher economic returns than the cloransulam-methyl treatment alone. All other POST systems, with the exception of lactofen applied alone, had similar economic returns. Tank-mixtures of cloransulam-methyl and diphenyl ether herbicides increased the spectrum of control and soybean yield compared with these herbicides applied alone.
机译:1995年和1996年在北卡罗来纳州的三个地点进行了田间研究,以评估除草剂和大豆的伤害,以及单独使用氯苯舒兰-甲基或与阿氟氟磺草胺,氟美沙芬或乳清混合的罐混物中的芽后(POST)处理,与商业标准的阿昔洛芬加苯达松。单独使用氯兰舒兰甲基处理后7 d,大豆损伤为2%至3%,而与fomesafen,乳果芬,acifluorfen或acifluorfen加苯达松一起使用,则11%至46%。单独施用甲基氯兰舒兰控制了全叶牵牛花和常春藤牵牛花的95%。加入阿氟氟醚,氟美沙芬或乳粉未增加对照。与单独使用二甲基烯胺的出苗前相比,氯兰舒兰甲基将普通羊羔的控制提高到至少81%(控制为69%)。所有的二苯醚除草剂处理均控制了普通羊羔至少91%。治疗后8周,氯兰舒兰甲基对刺rick的idad控制范围为14%至73%。用二苯醚类除草剂控制多刺的ida(控制73%至100%)。与单独使用的任何一种除草剂相比,氯兰舒兰甲基+福美沙芬和克洛苏拉姆甲基+氟苯磺草胺的罐混物增加了刺的防治效果。与所有二苯醚除草剂或单独使用氯兰舒兰-甲基处理相比,所有桶混物的大豆产量都更高。但是,仅acifluorfen +氯兰舒兰甲基处理比单独使用氯兰舒兰甲基处理具有更高的经济回报。除单独使用乳果芬外,所有其他POST系统都具有相似的经济收益。与单独使用的这些除草剂相比,氯兰舒兰甲基和二苯醚除草剂的桶混物增加了对照谱和大豆产量。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号