首页> 外文期刊>Water resources research >Scenario workshops: A useful method for participatory water resources planning?
【24h】

Scenario workshops: A useful method for participatory water resources planning?

机译:方案研讨会:参与式水资源规划的有用方法?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This article reports on a scenario workshop (SW) for water resources management at the island of Naxos, Greece. The workshop was part of a European research project studying the advantages and limitations of different participatory methods in the context of the Water Framework Directive. It involved policy makers, scientists, business representatives, and citizens from different parts of the island. On the first day, participants worked to envision a sustainable development future for the island and its water resources. Discussion was inspired by four alternative water development scenarios prepared by the organizers. Participants' vision statements emphasized a diversified development path and balanced water solutions. On the second day, participants worked to plan the actions needed to realize their common vision. The SW turned out to be a good method to initiate a multipartner dialogue, to include new stakeholders in the water policy debate, and to a certain extent, to promote learning between participants. On the other hand, it did not appear well suited to resolve conflicts and aid decisions in the face of scientific complexity and uncertainty. SW seems to be a good method for the "upstream," preparatory, capacity-building tasks of a planning process but not for the production of substantive decision outputs such as consensual agreements or action plans. The Naxos experiment also raised the centrality of framing, participant selection, and facilitation in participatory processes.
机译:本文报告了在希腊纳克索斯岛进行水资源管理的情景研讨会(SW)。该讲习班是欧洲研究项目的一部分,研究了《水框架指令》背景下不同参与方法的优缺点。它吸引了来自岛上不同地区的决策者,科学家,商业代表和公民。在第一天,与会人员努力为该岛及其水资源设想一个可持续发展的未来。讨论的灵感来自组织者准备的四种替代水开发方案。与会者的愿景声明强调了多元化的发展道路和平衡的水解决方案。在第二天,参与者计划了实现共同愿景所需的行动。事实证明,西南部是发起多方对话,在水政策辩论中包括新的利益相关方以及在一定程度上促进参与者之间学习的好方法。另一方面,面对科学的复杂性和不确定性,它似乎不太适合解决冲突和协助决策。 SW对于计划过程的“上游”准备工作,能力建设任务似乎是一个很好的方法,但对于产生实质性决定输出(例如,协商一致的协议或行动计划)而言,则不是一个好方法。 Naxos实验还提高了参与过程中框架,参与者选择和促进的中心地位。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号