...
首页> 外文期刊>Water Policy >Public water supply and sanitation policies and inclusive development of the urban poor in Brazil
【24h】

Public water supply and sanitation policies and inclusive development of the urban poor in Brazil

机译:巴西城市贫民的公共供水和卫生政策和包容性发展

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Poorly designed policies jeopardise ecosystems and their services and the expansion of basic services to vulnerable populations. In the water and sanitation (WatSan) sector, inadequate access of the urban poor to formal and public drinking water supply and sanitation services (WSS) calls for more inclusive policies. Inclusive development (ID) has social, environmental and relational dimensions. However, there is little research on operationalising ID dimensions in WatSan policy discourse analysis. Hence, this paper addresses: How can we elaborate on indicators for inclusive WatSan policies? How can these be applied to assess the design of Brazilian WatSan policies? It examines the literature on ID and WatSan, develops and applies an analytical framework with six indicators to assess ID in WSS through policy analysis: access to minimum WSS; access to WSS even if the urban poor do not have formal housing; domestic wastewater collection/treatment; water availability; participation; and WSS subsidies for low-income people. Comparison between two Brazilian WatSan policies shows that the current WatSan law scores higher on ID than the previous law but neglects key aspects of social, environmental and relational ID dimensions. The selected indicators were useful to operationalise ID in WatSan policy discourse analysis and can boost policy design assessment elsewhere.
机译:设计不佳的政策危及生态系统及其服务以及扩展基本服务的弱势群体。在水和卫生(Watsan)部门,城市贫困人口不足以正式和公共饮用水供应和卫生服务(WSS)要求更多包容性政策。包容性发展(ID)具有社会,环境和关系维度。但是,在不加汉政策话语分析中的运营ID维度几乎没有研究。因此,本文涉及:我们如何详细说明包容性的沃地扬政策的指标?如何应用这些来评估巴西沃哈兰政策的设计?它审查了ID和Watsan上的文献,开发并使用六个指标进行分析框架,通过政策分析评估WSS中的ID:访问最低WSS;即使城市贫困人士没有正式住房,也可以访问WSS;国内污水收集/治疗;水可用性;参与;和WSS补贴低收入人民。两项巴西·沃特山政策的比较表明,目前的不加州法律对ID比以前的法律更高,而是忽视了社会,环境和关系ID维度的关键方面。所选指标可用于运营Watsan政策话语分析中的ID,并在其他地方提高政策设计评估。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Water Policy》 |2019年第2期|351-367|共17页
  • 作者单位

    Univ Amsterdam AISSR Governance & Inclus Dev Programme Grp GID Amsterdam Netherlands|IHE Delft Inst Water Educ Dept Integrated Water Syst & Governance IWSG Delft Netherlands;

    Univ Amsterdam AISSR Governance & Inclus Dev Programme Grp GID Amsterdam Netherlands|IHE Delft Inst Water Educ Dept Integrated Water Syst & Governance IWSG Delft Netherlands;

    Univ Amsterdam AISSR Governance & Inclus Dev Programme Grp GID Amsterdam Netherlands|IHE Delft Inst Water Educ Dept Integrated Water Syst & Governance IWSG Delft Netherlands;

    Univ Amsterdam AISSR Governance & Inclus Dev Programme Grp GID Amsterdam Netherlands|IHE Delft Inst Water Educ Dept Integrated Water Syst & Governance IWSG Delft Netherlands;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

    Brazil; Inclusive development; Operational indicators; Policy discourses; Pro-poor; Urban water and sanitation;

    机译:巴西;包容性发展;运营指标;政策致密;穷人;城市水和卫生;

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号