首页> 外文期刊>Water Economics and Policy >Households' Perceptions of 'Reasonable' Water Bills in Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam
【24h】

Households' Perceptions of 'Reasonable' Water Bills in Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam

机译:家庭对越南胡志明市“合理”水费的看法

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

A survey of 2075 households was conducted in Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam in 2019 to estimate what respondents thought a "reasonable" monthly water bill would be for a randomly-assigned monthly quantity of water. Two different elicitation procedures were used to estimate respondents' reasonable water bills. First, 830 respondents were asked two open-ended questions: (ⅰ) to state a water bill that they considered reasonable for the exogenously-assigned monthly quantity of water, and (ⅱ) to state a reasonable water bill for their current water use. Second, 1245 respondents were asked a series of questions from a stochastic payment card (SPC). Four results are new and unexpected. First, respondents report some bills to be too low, suggesting perhaps that they realize suggesting perhaps that they realize that heavily subsidized water services and that heavily subsidized water services have unintended, negative consequences for consumers such as unreliable, poor quality service. Second, when asked about why they found a monthly water bill for specific quantity of water use "reasonable," 25% of respondents said that one of the reasons was that "the bill is enough to cover the cost of provision," suggesting that some respondents considered the costs to the supplier when deciding whether or not a monthly water bill for specific quantity of water use was reasonable. Third, respondents' self-reported reasonable water bills suggest support for a positive fixed charge in the tariff structure. Fourth, many respondents' interpretation of the term "reasonable water bill" does not seem to place too much emphasis on the affordability of the bill to poor households.
机译:2019年越南胡志明市对2075户家庭进行了调查,估计受访者认为“合理”每月水费将用于随机分配的月量的水。两种不同的诱导程序用于估计受访者合理的水费。首先,830名受访者被问及两个开放式问题:(Ⅰ)陈述一个水费,他们认为他们是合理的,即用于外源分配的每月水量,(Ⅱ)陈述适合其目前的水费。其次,1245名受访者被问及一系列来自随机支付卡(SPC)的问题。四个结果是新的和意外的。首先,受访者报告了一些账单太低,表明他们意识到他们意识到他们意识到,他们意识到沉重的补贴水服务,并且额外补贴的水服务意外,对消费者如不可靠,优质的服务等消费者的负面影响。第二,当被问及为什么他们发现每月的水费用水量使用“合理”,25%的受访者表示,其中一个原因是“该法案足以支付规定的费用”,建议有些受访者在决定特定用水量的每月水法案是否有合理时审议了供应商的成本。第三,受访者的自我报告合理的水费建议支持关税结构的正固定费用。第四,许多受访者对“合理的水费”一词的解释似乎并没有太多强调账单给贫困家庭的负担能力。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号