...
首页> 外文期刊>Waste Management >Life cycle assessment of garden waste management options including long-term emissions after land application
【24h】

Life cycle assessment of garden waste management options including long-term emissions after land application

机译:园林废弃物管理方案的生命周期评估,包括土地应用后的长期排放

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

A life cycle assessment (LCA) was performed on five garden waste treatment practices: the production of mature compost including the woody fraction (MCIW), the production of mature compost without the woody fraction (MCWW), the production of immature compost without the woody fraction (ICWW), fresh garden waste including the woody fraction (GWIW) and fresh garden waste without the woody fraction (GWWW). The assessment included carbon sequestration after land application of the garden waste and composts, and associated emissions. The removed woody fraction was incinerated and energy recovery included as heat and electricity. The functional unit of the assessment was treatment of 1000 kg of garden waste generated in Denmark. Overall, the results showed that composting of garden waste resulted in comparable or higher environmental impact potentials (depletion of abiotic resources, marine eutrophication, and terrestrial eutrophication and acidification) than no treatment before land application. The toxicity potentials showed the highest normalised impact potentials for all the scenarios, but were unaffected by the different garden waste treatments. The choice of energy source for substituted heat and electricity production affected the performance of the different treatment scenarios with respect to climate change. The scenarios with removal of the woody fraction performed better than the scenarios without removal of the woody fraction when fossil energy sources were substituted, but performed worse when renewable energy sources were substituted. Furthermore, the study showed the importance of including long-term emission factors after land application of fresh and composted garden waste products since the greatest proportion of carbon and nitrogen emissions occurred after land application in three out of the five scenarios for carbon and in all scenarios for nitrogen. (C) 2019 Published by Elsevier Ltd.
机译:对五种花园废物处理方法进行了生命周期评估(LCA):生产包括木屑的成熟堆肥(MCIW),不使用木屑的成熟堆肥(MCWW),不使用木屑的未成熟堆肥的生产分数(ICWW),包括木屑的新鲜花园垃圾(GWIW)和不含木屑的新鲜花园垃圾(GWWW)。评估包括将土地废物和堆肥在土地上施用后的碳固存,以及相关的排放量。焚烧除去的木质部分,回收的能量包括热和电。评估的功能单元是处理丹麦产生的1000公斤花园废物。总体而言,结果表明,与未进行土地处理之前的任何处理相比,对花园废物进行堆肥可产生可比或更高的环境影响潜力(非生物资源的消耗,海洋富营养化以及陆地富营养化和酸化)。在所有情况下,毒性潜力均表现出最高的标准化影响潜力,但不受不同花园废物处理的影响。用于替代热力和电力生产的能源的选择影响了有关气候变化的不同处理方案的性能。当替代化石能源时,去除木质部分的情况比未去除木质部分的情况要好,但是当替代可再生能源时,情况要差。此外,该研究表明,在土地上施用新鲜和堆肥后的花园废弃物后,必须包括长期排放因子,因为在碳的所有五个情景中,有三个情景以及所有情景中,最大的碳和氮排放量发生在土地施用后氮。 (C)2019由Elsevier Ltd.发布

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号