...
首页> 外文期刊>Waste Management >Comparing wasted apples and oranges: An assessment of methods to measure household food waste
【24h】

Comparing wasted apples and oranges: An assessment of methods to measure household food waste

机译:比较废苹果和橙子:评估家庭食物浪费的方法

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Food waste has become a global concern in recent years, especially the household food waste that is generated in the developed world. Multiple methods to measure household food waste have been proposed, but little is known about their validity. Five methods are selected and investigated empirically: survey questions about general food waste over a non-specified period of time, diaries, photo coding, kitchen caddies, and pre-announced survey questions regarding a specific time period. In an experiment, respondents were asked to assess their food waste using some or all of these methods depending on condition. Overall, the general survey questions appear to be less valid, as these lead to large underestimation of the level of food waste, low variance in reported food waste across households compared to the other methods, and low correlations with other measures. The other four methods are relatively highly correlated. A survey about food waste in the past week appears to be a useful method for large-scale measurements to differentiate households according to the amount of food waste each produces, although it should be noted that this method underestimates the amount of food waste. Kitchen caddies and photo coding seem to be valid methods and, for small samples, provide alternatives to food diaries, which have been more commonly used. (C) 2019 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.
机译:近年来,食物垃圾已成为全球关注的问题,尤其是发达国家产生的家庭食物垃圾。已经提出了多种测量家庭食物垃圾的方法,但对其有效性知之甚少。选择并以经验方式调查了五种方法:调查有关非指定时间段内的一般食物垃圾的问题,日记,照片编码,厨房球童,以及有关特定时间段的预先宣布的调查问题。在一项实验中,要求受访者根据情况使用部分或全部这些方法来评估他们的食物浪费。总体而言,一般调查问题似乎不太有效,因为这些问题导致对食物垃圾水平的低估,与其他方法相比家庭报告的食物垃圾差异小,与其他措施的相关性低。其他四种方法的相关性相对较高。过去一周的食物垃圾调查似乎是一种有用的方法,可用于根据每个食物垃圾产生的食物量进行大规模测量,以区分家庭,尽管应注意,这种方法低估了食物垃圾的数量。厨房球童和照片编码似乎是有效的方法,并且对于较小的样本,可提供食品日记的替代品,而食品日记已被更常用。 (C)2019作者。由Elsevier Ltd.发布

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号