首页> 外文期刊>Wall street & technology >THE GREAT ORDER FLOW DEBATE
【24h】

THE GREAT ORDER FLOW DEBATE

机译:大订单流程辩论

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

As transaction cost analysis (TCA) tools emerge on the desktop, buy-side traders increasingly are scrutinizing the quality of their executions — both to dissect their own trading perform-ance and rank their brokers. But, while many firms use TCA to help direct their order flow, there are questions about the prudence of relying solely on these metrics to select brokers. Meanwhile, the trend toward measuring execution quality is accelerating as buy-side traders take more control over their executions through direct market access (DMA) and algorithmic trading strategies. While there are regulatory pressures from pension plan sponsors and the need to comply with best-execution obligations from the SEC, it is, in large part, this shift in control from the sell-side block desk to the buy side's own trading desk that is driving the current TCA momentum.
机译:随着桌面上交易成本分析(TCA)工具的出现,买方交易者越来越在仔细检查其执行质量-既剖析自己的交易绩效,又对经纪人进行排名。但是,尽管许多公司使用TCA来帮助指导其订单流程,但对于仅依靠这些指标来选择经纪人的谨慎性存在疑问。同时,随着买方交易者通过直接市场准入(DMA)和算法交易策略对其执行的更多控制,衡量执行质量的趋势正在加速。尽管养老金计划发起人面临监管压力,并且需要遵守SEC的最佳执行义务,但在很大程度上,这种控制权从卖方大宗交易台转移到了买方自己的交易台上,推动当前的TCA势头。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号