首页> 外文期刊>Utilities Policy >To corporatize or not to corporatize (and if so, how?)
【24h】

To corporatize or not to corporatize (and if so, how?)

机译:公司化或不公司化(如果是,则如何?)

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Governments around the world are increasingly turning to the use of stand-alone, state-owned utilities to deliver core services such as water and electricity. This article reviews the history of such 'corporatization' and argues that its recent resurgence has been heavily influenced by neoliberal theory and practice, raising important questions about whether it should be adopted as a public service model. Not all corporatizations promote commercialization, however. The article also discusses stand-alone utilities that have managed to stave off market pressures and develop in more equity-oriented directions. The scope for non-commercialized corporatization is narrow, but given the expansion of this organizational model it is important that we understand both its limitations and potentials, particularly in low-income countries in the South where service gaps are large and equity is a major challenge. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
机译:世界各地的政府越来越多地转向使用独立的国有公用事业来提供水和电等核心服务。本文回顾了这种“公司化”的历史,并认为其最近的复兴受到新自由主义理论和实践的严重影响,从而引发了有关是否应将其作为公共服务模式的重要问题。但是,并非所有公司化都能促进商业化。本文还讨论了独立的公用事业公司,这些公用事业公司已成功避免了市场压力,并朝着更加以股票为导向的方向发展。非商业化公司化的范围很窄,但是鉴于这种组织模式的扩展,重要的是我们既要了解其局限性,也要了解其潜力,特别是在服务差距较大且公平是主要挑战的南方低收入国家中。 (C)2016 Elsevier Ltd.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号