首页> 外文期刊>Utilities Policy >Ownership, corruption, and revenue regimes for infrastructure partnerships: Evidence from China
【24h】

Ownership, corruption, and revenue regimes for infrastructure partnerships: Evidence from China

机译:基础设施合作伙伴关系的所有权,腐败和收益机制:来自中国的证据

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Public-private partnerships (PPPs) have become an important tool to build infrastructure and deliver public services. In China, infrastructure partners include both state-owned enterprises and private companies. We theorize that partners with different ownership types will have different preferences of revenue regimes for infrastructure projects and that regional corruption will moderate this relationship. We use data from the China PPP Center and official statistics to test these hypotheses, and the findings largely confirm our expectations. In comparison to private firms, SOEs and hybrids are more likely to pursue a government-payment mechanism, but the moderating effect of regional corruption is not supported.
机译:公私伙伴关系(PPP)已成为建立基础设施和提供公共服务的重要工具。在中国,基础设施合作伙伴包括国有企业和私营公司。我们认为拥有不同所有权类型的合作伙伴对基础设施项目的收入制度会有不同的偏好,而区域腐败将缓和这种关系。我们使用来自中国PPP中心的数据和官方统计数据来检验这些假设,这些发现很大程度上证实了我们的期望。与私营企业相比,国有企业和混合型企业更可能采用政府支付机制,但不支持区域腐败的缓和作用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号