首页> 外文期刊>USA today >Religious Liberty Derives from Property Rights
【24h】

Religious Liberty Derives from Property Rights

机译:宗教自由源于财产权

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Many christians, while they cherish religious liberty, seem to believe that property rights, and the commerce that arises from the establishment of property rights, are somehow un-Christian. At the same time, a lot of free marketers seem to think that all we need are property rights and the rest will take care of itself. Neither of these views is correct, and I will explain why with reference to Pres. James Madison and British Prime Minister Winston Churchill. Pope Francis is one who sometimes seems to be an example of the Christian who reads the New Testament as pointing in the direction of socialism. Commerce appears, in some of his writings and speeches, to be a grubby business purely based on self-interest-maybe even on exploitation, the opposite of charity. This reading of the New Testament-which I think flawed, by the way-is why Karl Marx, although he famously was an atheist and mili-tantly opposed to Christianity, praised Christianity in one respect: that it declaimed against private property in the name of an otherworldly denial of self.
机译:许多基督徒虽然崇尚宗教信仰自由,但他们似乎认为,财产权以及因建立财产权而产生的商业都不是基督教徒。同时,许多自由市场人士似乎认为我们需要的只是财产权,其余的将自理。这些观点都不正确,我将参考Pres解释其原因。詹姆斯·麦迪逊(James Madison)和英国首相温斯顿·丘吉尔(Winston Churchill)。弗朗西斯教皇是一个有时似乎是基督徒的例子,他认为新约圣经指向社会主义的方向。在他的一些著作和演讲中,商业似乎纯粹是出于个人利益,甚至是基于剥削,是一项肮脏的生意,这与慈善相反。读这本新约圣经(我认为这是有缺陷的)是为什么卡尔·马克思(尽管著名的是无神论者并且反对基督教)却在一个方面称赞基督教:它以名义反对私人财产超凡脱俗的自我否认。

著录项

  • 来源
    《USA today》 |2016年第2850期|38-40|共3页
  • 作者

    Larry P. Arn;

  • 作者单位
  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号