首页> 外文会议>International Conference on Risk Management, Assessment and Mitigation >The Nature of Intellectual Property Rights considering the relation between the author's prerogatives and the Human Rights and Civil Liberties
【24h】

The Nature of Intellectual Property Rights considering the relation between the author's prerogatives and the Human Rights and Civil Liberties

机译:考虑提交人的特权与人权和公民自由关系的知识产权的性质

获取原文

摘要

The intellectual property protection represents a source of violation of fundamental rights and civil liberties, i.e. the right to protection of personal data, the right to privacy, freedom to send and receive information, freedom of information, freedom to contract and freedom to carry out economic activities (freedom of commerce). The best guideline is provided by the CJEU's and US Supreme Court's case law that are highly complex and nuanced, not denying in any way the importance of intellectual property. In this field we have no absolute but relative rights corresponding to a propter rem obligation of the owner of the intellectual creation's material support (i.e. electronic support), which cannot reproduce it without a breach of the author's patrimonial and moral rights, considering also that the intellectual creation, by its nature, cannot be appropriated by a person. This impossibility of appropriating a piece of work is not just a consequence of its intangibility, but it also derives from the relationship between the intellectual creations and society, universal patrimony and knowledge.
机译:知识产权保护代表违反基本权利和公民自由的源泉,即保护个人数据的权利,隐私权,自由发送和接收信息,信息自由,合同自由和自由履行经济活动(商业自由)。最佳指导方针由CJEU和美国最高法院的案例法提供,这是一种高度复杂和细微的,而不是以任何方式否认知识产权的重要性。在这一领域,我们没有绝对但对应于知识产权的所有者(即电子支持)的拥有者的扶持人的相对权限,而不违反作者的委托和道德权利,这也无法违反作者知识分子创作,其性质不能被一个人拨出。这种不可能挪用一项工作不仅仅是一种不合理的后果,而且它也源于知识创作与社会之间的关系,普遍的怜悯和知识。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号