首页> 外文期刊>Urban Studies >Virtual special issue editorial essay: 'The shitty rent business': What's the point of land rent theory?
【24h】

Virtual special issue editorial essay: 'The shitty rent business': What's the point of land rent theory?

机译:虚拟特刊社论文章:“低劣的租金业务”:地租理论的意义是什么?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

In this introduction to a virtual special issue on land rent, we sketch out the history of land rent theory, encompassing classical political economy, Marx's political economy, the marginalist turn and subsequent foundations for urban economics, and the Marxist consensus around rent theory during geography's spatial turn. We then overview some of the contemporary strands of literature that have developed since the break down of this consensus, namely political economy approaches centred on capital-switching, institutionalism of various stripes, and the rent gap theory. We offer a critical urban political economy perspective and a particular set of arguments run through the review: first, land is not the same as capital but has unique attributes as a factor of production which require a separate theorisation. Second, since the 1970s consensus around land rent and the city dissipated, the critical literature has tended to take the question of why/how the payment exists at all for granted and so has ignored the particular dynamics of rent arising from the idiosyncrasies of land. Amongst the talk of an Anthropocene' and planetary urbanisation' it is surprising that the economic fulcrum of the capitalist remaking of geography has fallen so completely off the agenda. It is time to bring rent back into the analysis of land, cities and capitalism.
机译:在这篇关于地租的虚拟特刊的介绍中,我们概述了地租理论的历史,包括古典政治经济学,马克思的政治经济学,边际主义转向和随后的城市经济学基础,以及马克思主义关于地理理论在地租理论上的共识。空间转向。然后,我们概述了自这一共识破裂以来出现的一些当代文学作品,即以资本转换,各种制度主义和租金差距理论为中心的政治经济学方法。我们提供了批判性的城市政治经济学观点,并在审查过程中提出了一组特定的论点:首先,土地与资本不同,但作为生产要素具有独特的属性,需要单独的理论化。其次,自从1970年代关于土地租金的共识和城市消散以来,批判性文献趋向于质疑为什么/如何存在付款是理所当然的事情,因此忽略了土地特殊性引起的租金的特殊变化。在关于人类世和行星城市化的讨论中,令人惊讶的是,资本主义重塑地理的经济支点已经完全不在议程之列。现在是时候将租金重新纳入对土地,城市和资本主义的分析中了。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号