首页> 外文学位 >MARX'S CONCEPT OF GROUND-RENT, AND LANDOWNER REVENUE: THE RELATION OF MARX'S CONCEPT OF GROUND-RENT TO THE HISTORICAL ANALYSIS OF LANDOWNER REVENUE FROM THE PRODUCTION OF PETROLEUM.
【24h】

MARX'S CONCEPT OF GROUND-RENT, AND LANDOWNER REVENUE: THE RELATION OF MARX'S CONCEPT OF GROUND-RENT TO THE HISTORICAL ANALYSIS OF LANDOWNER REVENUE FROM THE PRODUCTION OF PETROLEUM.

机译:马克思的地租概念和兰登尔收入:马克思的地租概念与石油生产中兰德勒收入的历史分析之间的关系。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Recent Marxist interpretations of Marx's concept of ground-rent have argued for a critical reconstruction, that would align the concept with historical circumstances for which it is said to account inadequately. However, these Marxist interpretations have misrepresented, misused and distorted Marx's concept of ground-rent and, by extension, his general theory of capital. As a result, they have created the very problems that they attribute to Marx's theory. The object of our dissertation is to return to Capital in order to determine the actual meaning of Marx's concept of ground-rent, and, to determine how the concept can be related to the historical analysis of landowner revenue, particularly of landowner revenue from the production of petroleum.;Our study will conclude that Marx's concept of ground-rent cannot be applied directly to historical explanation, as if it were an empirical indicator; it will conclude that Marx's concept of ground-rent is to be used as a "guide," for the historical specification of actual landowner revenues.;First, we will demonstate that Marx's concept of ground-rent is an extension of his concept of the equalization of the rate of profit, operating under the restrictions imposed by modern landed property. Second, we will demonstrate that Pierre Philippe Rey, Samir Amin and other Marxists, confusing absolute ground-rent with monopoly revenue, have changed Marx's concept from a law of surplus-value distribution to a contingency laden effect of history, i.e. of class or political struggle. Third, we will explain monopoly revenues without modifying Marx's formulation of a concept of ground-rent: i.e., we will construct a concept of monopoly surplus-profit, not at the level of the theory of capital and not even at the level of historical analysis, but at an intermediary level of theory, called stage theory; and, within this stage theory, a theory of stage of Imperialism, we will contrast our concept of monopoly surplus-profit, with the stage concepts of monopoly ground-rent and State-type revenue. Finally we will construct a framework for a historical notion of revenue that will permit the use of Marx's concept in the historical analysis of landowner revenue that derives from the production of petroleum.
机译:马克思主义最近对马克思的地租概念的解释要求进行批判性的重建,这将使该概念与历史环境相吻合,据说这种历史环境对此没有充分说明。然而,这些马克思主义的解释错误地歪曲了马克思的地租概念,并进而歪曲了他的一般资本理论。结果,他们创造了归因于马克思理论的问题。本文的目的是回到《资本论》,以确定马克思的地租概念的实际含义,并确定该概念如何与土地所有者收益,尤其是生产中的土地所有者收益的历史分析联系起来。我们的研究将得出结论,马克思的地租概念不能直接应用于历史解释,就好像它是经验指标一样。得出的结论是,马克思的地租概念将被用作对实际土地所有者收入的历史说明的“指南”。首先,我们将证明马克思的地租概念是他的地租概念的扩展。利润率均等化,在现代有地财产的限制下运作。其次,我们将证明皮埃尔·菲利普·雷伊,萨米尔·阿明和其他马克思主义者将绝对地租与垄断收入相混淆,已将马克思的概念从剩余价值分配定律转变为历史的偶然性负载效应,即阶级或政治的斗争。第三,我们将在不修改马克思对地租概念的表述的情况下解释垄断收入:即,我们将建立垄断盈余概念,而不是在资本理论层面,甚至在历史分析层面,但处于中间级理论(称为阶段理论);在这个阶段性理论(即帝国主义阶段性理论)中,我们将把垄断剩余利润的概念与垄断地租和国家型收入的阶段性概念进行对比。最后,我们将为收入的历史概念构建一个框架,该框架将允许在对石油生产产生的土地所有者收入的历史分析中使用马克思的概念。

著录项

  • 作者

    DANIK, CLAUDE.;

  • 作者单位

    York University (Canada).;

  • 授予单位 York University (Canada).;
  • 学科 Sociology Social Structure and Development.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 1987
  • 页码 1 p.
  • 总页数 1
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-17 11:50:52

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号