首页> 外文期刊>Urban Studies >The China model withering? Institutional roots of China's local developmentalism
【24h】

The China model withering? Institutional roots of China's local developmentalism

机译:中国模式枯萎了吗?中国地方发展主义的制度根源

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

China's new development wave since the mid-1990s is distinguishable by its strong urbanism. Urban governments, particularly at municipal and county levels, rushed to build industrial parks. Urban landscape was also fundamentally transformed by their massive investments in infrastructures - both residential and commercial properties. How to explain local governments' continuing drive for development? Why has this particular policy combination gained traction among local officials? We approach these questions by making a simple assumption about local governments as revenue maximisers. Their desires for more revenues are constrained by two institutional changes. Vertically, the central government recentralised the fiscal system, leaving local governments in fiscal shortages. Liberalisation and regional competition in the late 1990s further exacerbated their revenue imperative. The land regime provided the final institutional link that enabled local officials to leverage urban infrastructure and real estate for industrial expansion. This study can shed some light on the ongoing debate about China's development model in the urban literature.
机译:自1990年代中期以来,中国的新发展浪潮以其强烈的城市化特色为特征。城市政府,特别是市县级政府,急于建立工业园区。他们对住宅和商业物业等基础设施的大量投资也从根本上改变了城市景观。如何解释地方政府的持续发展动力?为什么这种特殊的政策组合赢得了地方官员的青睐?我们通过对地方政府作为收入最大化者的简单假设来解决这些问题。他们渴望获得更多收入的愿望受到了两次体制变革的限制。纵向上,中央政府将财政体系重新集中,使地方政府处于财政短缺状态。 1990年代后期的自由化和区域竞争进一步加剧了他们的收入势头。土地制度提供了最终的制度联系,使地方官员能够利用城市基础设施和房地产进行工业扩张。这项研究可以为正在进行的有关城市文学中的中国发展模式的辩论提供一些启示。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号