首页> 外文期刊>Urban affairs review >Blurring Lines? How Locally Based Collaborations Handle the Redistribution/Development Tradeoff
【24h】

Blurring Lines? How Locally Based Collaborations Handle the Redistribution/Development Tradeoff

机译:线条模糊?基于本地的协作如何处理重新分配/开发权衡

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

The tension between the pursuit of equity versus economic growth has been a central focus on the field of urban politics. Although local governance regimes have tended to focus on growth policies and the accommodation of business interests, regime theorists have argued that it is possible, albeit challenging, to construct sustainable coalitions to support equity agendas. In this article, we empirically examine the equity/development trade-off with a focus on the renewed interest in locally based, cross-sector collaborations for educational improvement, providing a nuanced picture of how these initiatives present themselves to the public. We find that a substantial proportion of initiatives describe themselves as equity oriented or both equity and economic growth oriented. Labeling these education initiatives as growth oriented is more typical of collaborations that started in prior decades, whereas an orientation toward equity is more common in collaborations with greater union and community organization representation and those affiliated with national networks.
机译:追求公平与经济增长之间的紧张关系一直是城市政治领域的主要关注点。尽管地方治理体制倾向于把重点放在增长政策和商业利益的调和上,但政权理论家认为,尽管有挑战性,但可以建立可持续的联盟来支持股权议程。在本文中,我们以经验为基础考察了公平/发展之间的权衡,重点是人们对基于本地的跨部门合作以提高教育水平的兴趣,从而提供了这些举措如何向公众展示的细微差别。我们发现,很大一部分举措都将自己描述为以股权为导向或以股权和经济增长为导向。在前几十年开始的合作中,将这些教育举措标记为面向增长是更典型的做法,而在与工会和社区组织的代表人数增加以及与国家网络有联系的合作中,更趋于公平。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号