【24h】

COMMENT & DISCUSSION

机译:评论与讨论

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Remo Salta-Ironically, if the Littoral Combat Ship (LCS) program had been managed properly, we would have ended up with a small warship about the size of the highly innovative 450-ton Danish Flyvefisken-class patrol vessel, which used off-the-shelf technology for weapon "modules" that allowed the ship to be used for different purposes. This would have been a tremendous achievement, because we would have had a small, low-cost, and flexible LCS that would have been an ideal first command for young officers and a perfect training ship for inexperienced sailors. But now we're stuck with a large, overpriced, frigate-sized LCS that is too valuable to turn over to an inexperienced junior officer. And despite the original reason for the LCS, the Navy probably wouldn't risk an expensive and vulnerable warship like this in a high-threat area, such as off the coast of Iran.
机译:雷莫·萨尔塔(Remo Salta)具有讽刺意味的是,如果对沿海战斗舰(LCS)计划进行了妥善的管理,我们将最终得到一艘小型战舰,其规模是高度创新的450吨丹麦Flyvefisken级巡逻舰的大小,该巡逻舰使用了武器“模块”的货架技术,允许舰船用于不同目的。这将是一个巨大的成就,因为我们将拥有一个小型,低成本且灵活的LCS,这对于年轻军官来说是理想的第一命令,对于没有经验的水手来说,则是理想的训练船。但是现在,我们受困于大型,价格过高,护卫舰大小的LCS,它的价值太大,无法交给经验不足的下级军官。尽管有使用LCS的最初原因,但海军可能不会在高威胁地区(例如伊朗沿海)冒着这样的昂贵和脆弱的军舰的风险。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号