Judge's Commentary: The Outstanding Wind and Waterspray Papers

摘要

The summary that the MCM asks for is a standalone object that should not be identical to the introduction to the paper. The summary should briefly 1. state the problem, 2. describe the approach taken to modeling the problem, 3. state the most important results and conclusions the reader should remember, and 4. mention any recommendations directly relevant to the problem. The summary should not include a statement such as "read inside for results" or its equivalent. A good test a team can use to assess the quality of their summary is to ask, "If someone read only the summary without the rest of the report available, would it clearly tell the big picture story of what the problem was, what we did, what we concluded, and what we recommend?" As a note, most equations, code, and derivations belong somewhere else as well.