...
首页> 外文期刊>The UMAP Journal >Judges' Commentary: The Outstanding Leaf Problem Papers
【24h】

Judges' Commentary: The Outstanding Leaf Problem Papers

机译:法官评论:未解决的叶子问题论文

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

These four solutions had strong similarities-importantly, not in the solutions themselves. Models work when they provide understandable bases for reasonable decisions. All four solutions met that criterion and several others: 1. They were presented clearly. 1.1 The descriptive text was clear. There were comparatively few errors in grammar, vocabulary, or style; and these didn't interfere with the reader's understanding. 1.2 Graphics were appropriate and clear. They supported the argument being made. The appropriate text referred to them.
机译:这四个解决方案具有很强的相似性-重要的是,在解决方案本身中没有。模型为合理的决策提供了可理解的基础时,它们就会起作用。所有四个解决方案都满足该标准,还有其他几个满足条件:1.明确提出。 1.1描述性文字清晰。语法,词汇或风格方面的错误相对较少;这些都不会影响读者的理解。 1.2图形适当且清晰。他们支持提出的论点。适当的文字提到了他们。

著录项

  • 来源
    《The UMAP Journal》 |2012年第3期|223-229|共7页
  • 作者

    Peter Olsen;

  • 作者单位

    Commander, US Coast Guard Reserve Baltimore, MD;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号