首页> 外文期刊>Turkish Studies >Building Institutional Trust in Germany: Relative Success of the G??len and Milli G??r????
【24h】

Building Institutional Trust in Germany: Relative Success of the G??len and Milli G??r????

机译:在德国建立机构信任:G?len和Milli G?r ????的相对成功

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Transnational Islamic organizations play a significant role in the lives of Germany's substantial Turkish Muslim population. Nonetheless the relation between these movements and German authorities is far from uniform. While the Milli G??r???? is the largest Turkish transnational Islamic movement in Germany, the much smaller G??len Hareketi (G??len movement) has been significantly more successful in gaining the acceptance of local and national authorities. While traditional explanations argue that the G??len movement's a??liberal,a?? a??educational Islama?? has much more appeal to Western officials than the Milli G??r????'s a??anti-integrative,a?? a??political Islamism,a?? this paper argues that institutional structure of the two movements has historically been a more important factor than their ideological platforms in whether they can gain the trust of German authorities. The learning centers and interfaith dialogue centers of the G??len movement in Europe served as open, accessible, and neutral sites for German officials to visit and monitor, thereby enhancing communication and diminishing suspicion. In contrast, the mosque-based network of the Milli G??r???? served as a barrier between movement members and state officials. The structures in which the Milli G??r???? and G??len movement operated thus produced radically different outcomes in their ability to signal German authorities of the movements' ideologies and intentions.View full textDownload full textRelated var addthis_config = { ui_cobrand: "Taylor & Francis Online", services_compact: "citeulike,netvibes,twitter,technorati,delicious,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,more", pubid: "ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b" }; var addthis_config = {"data_track_addressbar":true,"ui_click":true}; Add to shortlist Link Permalink http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14683849.2011.604206
机译:跨国伊斯兰组织在德国大量土耳其穆斯林人口的生活中发挥着重要作用。尽管如此,这些运动与德国当局之间的关系还远非统一。而Milli G ?? r ????作为德国最大的土耳其跨国伊斯兰运动,规模较小的G?len Hareketi(G?len运动)在赢得地方和国家当局的认可方面取得了显著成功。传统的解释认为,“ Glen运动”是“自由主义者”,“ a”是自由主义者。教育伊斯兰教比Milli G?r ????的a?anti-integrative,a ??更具吸引力。政治伊斯兰主义本文认为,从历史上看,这两个运动的体制结构比它们的意识形态平台更重要,是它们能否获得德国当局的信任。欧洲G?len运动的学习中心和不同信仰间的对话中心是德国官员访问和监视的开放,方便,中立的场所,从而加强了沟通并减少了猜疑。相比之下,Milli G ?? r ????的基于清真寺的网络成为运动成员与州官员之间的障碍。 Milli G ?? r ????的结构因此,与G ?? len运动的行动在传达德国当局运动意识形态和意图的能力上产生了截然不同的结果。查看全文下载全文netvibes,推特,technorati,可口,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,更多”,发布:“ ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b”}; var addthis_config = {“ data_track_addressbar”:true,“ ui_click”:true};添加到候选列表链接永久链接http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14683849.2011.604206

著录项

  • 来源
    《Turkish Studies》 |2011年第3期|511-524|共14页
  • 作者

    Mathew Andrews;

  • 作者单位
  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号