首页> 外文期刊>Transportation Research. Part A, Policy and Practice >Distributional effects of road pricing: Assessment of nine scenarios for Paris
【24h】

Distributional effects of road pricing: Assessment of nine scenarios for Paris

机译:公路价格的分配效应:巴黎九种情景的评估

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

The starting point of this paper is to consider that there is no general answer to the question of the equity of urban road pricing. We therefore simulate and compare the distributional effects on commuters of nine toll scenarios for Paris, assuming that utility is nonlinear in income. We show that the distributional pattern across income groups depends crucially on the level of traffic reduction induced by tolling. Stringent tolls are more favourable to low-income motorists. Equity effects also vary with toll design. Compared to a reference scenario which uniformly charges all motorists driving within Paris, an inbound cordon toll is detrimental to low-incomes. Conversely, granting a rebate to low CO_2 emission cars slightly improves their situation while an exemption for Paris residents is neutral. Surprisingly, it matters little for social equity whether toll revenues are allocated to all commuters or solely to public transport users.
机译:本文的出发点是认为对城市道路价格公平性问题没有普遍的答案。因此,假设效用在收入中是非线性的,我们将模拟并比较巴黎九种收费方案对通勤者的分配影响。我们表明,各收入组之间的分配模式主要取决于通行费导致的交通减少水平。严格的收费标准对低收入驾驶者更有利。公平效应也因通行费设计而异。与向所有在巴黎内驾车的驾驶员统一收费的参考方案相比,入境警戒线收费对低收入不利。相反,对低CO_2排放的汽车给予折扣可以稍微改善其状况,而巴黎居民的豁免则是中性的。令人惊讶的是,通行费收入是分配给所有通勤者还是仅分配给公共交通用户,对社会公平意义不大。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号