...
首页> 外文期刊>Transportation Research >An empirical assessment of the feasibility of battery electric vehicles for day-to-day driving
【24h】

An empirical assessment of the feasibility of battery electric vehicles for day-to-day driving

机译:电动汽车日常驾驶可行性的实证评估

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Driven by sustainability objectives, Australia like many nations in the developed world, is considering the option of battery electric vehicles (BEVs) as an alternative to conventional internal combustion engine vehicles (ICEVs). In addition to issues of capital and running costs, crucial questions remain over the specifications of such vehicles, particularly the required driving range, recharge time, re-charging infrastructure, performance, and other attributes that will be of importance to consumers. With this in mind, this paper assesses (hypothetically) the extent to which current car travel needs could be met by BEVs for a sample of motorists in Sydney assuming a home-based charging set-up, which is likely to be the primary option for early adopters of the technology. The approach uses five weeks of driving data recorded by GPS technology and builds up home-home tours to assess the distances between (in effect) charging possibilities. An energy consumption model based on characteristics of the vehicle, and the speeds recorded by the GPS is adapted to determine the charge used, while a battery recharge function is used to determine charging times based on the current battery level. Among the most pertinent findings are that over the five weeks, (ⅰ) BEVs with a range as low as 60 km and a simple home-charge set-up would be able to accommodate well over 90% of day-to-day driving, (ⅱ) however the incidence of tours requiring out-of-home charging increases markedly for vehicles below 24 kWh (170 km range), (ⅲ) recharge time in itself has little impact on the feasibility of BEVs because vehicles spend the majority of their time parked and (ⅳ) effective range can be dramatically impacted by both how a vehicle is driven and use of electrical auxiliaries, and (ⅴ) while unsuitable for long, high-speed journeys without some external re-charging options, BEVs appear particularly suited for the majority of day-to-day city driving in big cities where average journey speeds of 34 km/h are close to optimal in terms of maximising vehicle range. The paper has implications for both policy-makers and auto manufacturers in breaking down some of the (perceived) barriers to greater uptake of BEVs in the future.
机译:在可持续发展目标的推动下,澳大利亚像发达国家中的许多国家一样,正在考虑选择电动汽车(BEV)替代传统的内燃机汽车(ICEV)。除了资本和运营成本问题外,这些车辆的规格还存在关键问题,尤其是所需的行驶里程,充电时间,基础设施的再充电,性能以及对消费者而言至关重要的其他属性。考虑到这一点,本文假设假设基于家庭的充电设置,评估了(假设性地)BEV可以满足悉尼一些驾车者当前汽车出行需求的程度,这很可能是该技术的早期采用者。该方法使用GPS技术记录的五个星期的行驶数据,并建立家庭旅行,以评估(实际上)充电可能性之间的距离。基于车辆特性的能量消耗模型以及GPS记录的速度适用于确定所用电量,而电池充电功能可用于根据当前电池电量确定充电时间。在最相关的调查结果中,有五个星期,(ⅰ)行驶距离低至60公里且设置简单的家庭充电设置的BEV能够满足90%以上的日常驾驶需求, (ⅱ)然而,对于低于24 kWh(170 km范围)的车辆,需要户外充电的旅行发生率显着增加。(ⅲ)充电时间本身对BEV的可行性影响不大,因为车辆花费了大部分时间车辆的驾驶方式和电动辅助装置的使用都会极大地影响停车时间和(ⅳ)有效范围,并且(ⅴ)不适合长时间高速行驶而没有一些外部充电选项的情况,BEV似乎特别适合适用于大城市的大多数日常城市驾驶,在最大车速方面,平均时速为34 km / h接近最佳水平。该文件对决策者和汽车制造商都具有重大意义,有助于他们打破某些(可感知的)障碍,从而在将来更大程度地吸收BEV。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号