首页> 外文期刊>Transport policy >Carbon reduction and travel behaviour: Discourses, disputes and contradictions in governance
【24h】

Carbon reduction and travel behaviour: Discourses, disputes and contradictions in governance

机译:减少碳排放和旅行行为:治理中的话题,争议和矛盾

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Prospects for mitigating climate change require decarbonisation of the energy sector over relatively short time periods, coupled with significant changes to the way we consume energy. This is particularly true in the transport sector given the current levels of transport-related greenhouse gas emissions, the heavy dependence on fossil fuels, and the uncertainty surrounding transition pathways to ultra-low carbon vehicles. There are policy responses aiming to reduce carbon emissions by changing travel behaviour, but prominent approaches share a common theme of seeking to change behaviour by focusing on the individual and their choices. These are the object of critics who maintain that effective change requires collective action at the social, economic and cultural levels. This paper questions whether decision-makers are relying on these choice-based approaches to change travel behaviour and, if so, how effective they expect them to be. We address this through analysis of over 50 interviews with policy stakeholders in England and Scotland. We find dominant policy approaches do focus on individual choices, but significantly it is not because decision-makers have faith in their effectiveness. These approaches persist in policy on carbon reduction for two reasons. One is appeal to a politically powerful, but incoherent, discourse of individualism. The second is that decision-makers do not want significant behavioural change. There is an imperative of economic growth and a firm belief that a strong economy is linked to higher traffic levels, and that to reduce the demand for travel is to risk economic damage. We argue that these beliefs about the relation between travel demand and prosperity are narrowly defined and contestable for empirical and normative reasons. If there is to be a significant change in the approach to intervening in travel demand there is an urgency to engage in the politics of behaviour change - a meta-level behaviour change challenge.
机译:缓解气候变化的前景要求能源部门在相对较短的时间内实现脱碳,同时我们的能源消费方式也将发生重大变化。鉴于当前与运输相关的温室气体排放水平,对化石燃料的严重依赖以及超低碳汽车过渡途径的不确定性,在运输部门尤其如此。有一些政策对策旨在通过改变出行行为来减少碳排放,但是突出的方法具有一个共同主题,即通过关注个人及其选择来寻求改变行为。这些是批评家的目标,他们认为有效的变革需要在社会,经济和文化层面上采取集体行动。本文质疑决策者是否依靠这些基于选择的方法来改变出行行为,如果是,那么他们希望它们如何有效。我们通过对英格兰和苏格兰的政策利益相关者进行的50多次访谈的分析来解决这个问题。我们发现占主导地位的政策方法确实着眼于个人选择,但这并不是因为决策者对其有效性有信心。这些方法坚持减少碳排放的政策有两个原因。一种是呼吁政治上有力量但不连贯的个人主义话语。第二个是决策者不希望行为发生重大变化。经济增长势在必行,并且坚信,强劲的经济与更高的交通水平息息相关,减少旅行需求是有可能遭受经济损失的。我们认为,关于旅行需求与繁荣之间关系的这些信念由于经验和规范方面的原因而被狭义地定义和争辩。如果干预出行需求的方式发生重大变化,那么就迫切需要参与行为改变的政治活动,这是对元级行为改变的挑战。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Transport policy》 |2014年第9期|71-78|共8页
  • 作者单位

    Institute for Transport Studies, University of Leeds, 34-40 University Road, Leeds LS2 9JT, UK;

    Institute for Transport Studies, University of Leeds, 34-40 University Road, Leeds LS2 9JT, UK;

    Department of Politics, University of Sheffield, Elmfield, Northumberland Road, Sheffield S10 2TU, UK;

    Department of Politics, University of Sheffield, Elmfield, Northumberland Road, Sheffield S10 2TU, UK;

    Department of Politics, University of Sheffield, Elmfield, Northumberland Road, Sheffield S10 2TU, UK,Murdoch University, Western Australia;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

    Carbon; Economy; Philosophy; Behaviour change; Choice;

    机译:碳;经济;哲学;行为改变;选择;

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号