...
首页> 外文期刊>Transactions of the ASABE >Corn Grain Drying Using Corn Stover Combustion and CHP Systems
【24h】

Corn Grain Drying Using Corn Stover Combustion and CHP Systems

机译:使用玉米秸秆燃烧和热电联产系统进行玉米谷物干燥

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Post-harvest drying of shelled corn grain requires large amounts of fossil fuel energy. In 2004, it was estimated that the upper Midwest consumed more than $1.4 billion of fossil fuels to dry $19.7 billion of corn grain. Over the long term, drying corn with fossil fuels may become cost prohibitive due to limited fuel reserves. To address future energy concerns for grain dryers, this study evaluated the potential use of combined heat and power (CHP) systems that use the combustion of corn stover both to produce heat for drying and to generate electricity for fans, augers, and control components. Net present value (NPV) cost estimates were determined for two continuous-flow dryers: a relatively small on-farm dryer (8.9 Mg h -1 ), and a larger dryer more common to grain elevators (73 Mg h -1 ). For each dryer, three levels of assumed stover price were used: $15, $25, and $35 per dry Mg for the small dryer, and $30, $45, and $60 per dry Mg for the larger dryer (includes payments to farmer and off-farm transport costs). Compared to equivalently sized fossil fuel-fired dryers, both the small and large CHP dryers were found to be more economical over the long term. Twenty-year NPV cost savings and breakeven points were estimated to be $63,523 and 14.3 years for the small CHP dryer ($25 Mg -1 stover) and $1,804,482 and 7.5 years for the large dryer ($45 Mg -1 stover). Sharing CHP infrastructure with other processes requiring heat that extend seasonal use can reduce payback periods significantly and provide broader efficiency benefits. Sensitivity analysis found cost savings to be most sensitive to fluctuations in fossil fuel costs, followed by annual use of dryer equipment
机译:带壳玉米谷物的收获后干燥需要大量的化石燃料能源。据估计,在2004年,中西部上层地区消耗了超过14亿美元的化石燃料,以干燥197亿美元的玉米。从长远来看,由于燃料储备有限,用化石燃料干燥玉米可能变得成本过高。为了解决谷物干燥机未来的能源问题,本研究评估了利用玉米秸秆燃烧产生热量来干燥并为风扇,螺旋钻和控制组件发电的热电联产(CHP)系统的潜在用途。确定了两个连续流干燥机的净现值(NPV)成本估算:相对较小的农场干燥机(8.9 Mg h -1 )和较大的谷物干燥机更常见的干燥机(73 Mg h -1 )。对于每台烘干机,使用了三个水平的假定灶具价格:小型烘干机的每干燥镁分别为15、25和35美元,大型烘干机的每干燥镁分别为30、45和60美元(包括支付给农民和农场外的款项)运输费用)。与相同尺寸的化石燃料干燥器相比,从长远来看,小型和大型的热电联产干燥器都更经济。小型CHP干燥机($ 25 Mg -1 炉灶)的20年NPV成本节省和损益平衡点估计分别为63,523美元和14.3年,大型干燥机($ 45 Mg 的$ 1,804,482和7.5年。 > -1 风笛)。与其他需要延长季节使用时间的供热过程共享CHP基础设施可以显着缩短投资回收期并提供更广泛的效率收益。敏感性分析发现,节省成本对化石燃料成本的波动最为敏感,其次是每年使用干燥设备

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号