首页> 外文期刊>Thin-Walled Structures >Review of API 650 Annex E: Design of large steel welded aboveground storage tanks excited by seismic loads
【24h】

Review of API 650 Annex E: Design of large steel welded aboveground storage tanks excited by seismic loads

机译:审查API 650附录E:地震载荷激发的大型钢制地上焊接钢储罐的设计

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

API 650's Annex E, which is an American Standard for designing aboveground steel storage tanks Subjected to seismic loads, is reviewed by comparing the design provisions in Annex E with other well-known design documents around the world, including that of New Zealand and Japan. Several limit states such as hydrodynamic hoop stress, uplift, base plate stress, buckling, freeboard, and two stability mechanisms, shear and overturning are investigated. The design provisions for each of the doctuhents were compared for identical tank geometries and seismic parameters for several different tank aspect ratios. The results show that API 650 is slightly under conservative in each of the material failure mechanisms compared to the New Zealand and Japanese design philosophies. The small disparity in results could be due to the fact that the approach in Annex E of API 650 is for tanks of rigid walls and a rigid foundation, whereas the New Zealand and Japanese documents consider tank and foundation flexibility. Despite some marginal differences, API 650 Annex E can be considered to adequately account for all the major failure states when compared to New Zealand and Japanese design documents for design purposes.
机译:通过比较附录E中的设计规定与包括新西兰和日本在内的世界其他知名设计文件,对API 650的附录E(一种设计用于承受地震荷载的地上钢制储罐的美国标准)进行了审查。研究了几种极限状态,例如流体动力环向应力,隆起,基板应力,屈曲,干舷以及两个稳定机制(剪切和倾覆)。针对相同的储罐几何形状和几种不同的储罐纵横比的地震参数,比较了每个文档的设计规定。结果表明,与新西兰和日本的设计理念相比,每种材料失效机理中的API 650都略为保守。结果之间的微小差异可能是由于以下事实:API 650的附录E中的方法适用于刚性墙和刚性基础的储罐,而新西兰和日本的文件则考虑了储罐和基础的柔性。尽管存在一些边际差异,但出于设计目的,与新西兰和日本的设计文件相比,API 650附件E可以被认为足以说明所有主要的失效状态。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号