首页> 外文期刊>Thin Solid Films >Three-dimensional deposition topography simulation based on new combinations of flux distribution and surface representation algorithms
【24h】

Three-dimensional deposition topography simulation based on new combinations of flux distribution and surface representation algorithms

机译:基于通量分布和表面表示算法新组合的三维沉积地形模拟

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

The development of a full three-dimensional (3-D) deposition topography simulator is indispensable to the precise estimation of thin film deposition topography on asymmetric deposition geometries. In this study, we expand the application range of the equi-volume rate model (EVRM), a cell-based surface representation algorithm for full 3-D topography simulation, into rigorous flux distribution algorithms such as the Monte Carlo method (MCM) and the ballistic transport and reaction model (BTRM). A new full 3-D deposition topography simulation is conducted based on the new combinations of flux distribution and surface representation algorithms. To ensure the effectiveness of our simulation, we conduct numerous simulations for various deposition geometries with varying sticking coefficients and directionality factors. We also compare the simulation results of MCM-EVRM and BTRM-EVRM versions. From the viewpoint of precise simulated topography, a particle-based MCM has better suitability to a cell-based EVRM than a flux-based BTRM. In addition, from the viewpoint of computational time, the MCM-EVRM method is apt for the complex geometries and for the deposition processes of high sticking coefficient; such as physical vapor deposition and plasma enhanced chemical vapor deposition. In the other hand, the BTRM-EVRM method is suitable for the simple geometries and for the processes of low sticking coefficient such as chemical vapor deposition.
机译:完整的三维(3-D)沉积形貌模拟器的开发对于精确估计不对称沉积几何形状上的薄膜沉积形貌是必不可少的。在这项研究中,我们将等体积速率模型(EVRM)的应用范围扩展到了严格的通量分布算法,如蒙特卡洛方法(MCM)和等效体积率模型(EVRM),该模型用于全3D地形模拟。弹道运输和反应模型(BTRM)。基于通量分布和表面表示算法的新组合,进行了新的全3D沉积形貌模拟。为确保模拟的有效性,我们针对具有不同黏着系数和方向性因子的各种沉积几何形状进行了许多模拟。我们还比较了MCM-EVRM和BTRM-EVRM版本的仿真结果。从精确的模拟地形学的角度来看,基于粒子的MCM比基于流量的BTRM更适合基于单元的EVRM。另外,从计算时间的角度来看,MCM-EVRM方法适用于复杂的几何形状和高粘附系数的沉积过程。例如物理气相沉积和等离子体增强的化学气相沉积。另一方面,BTRM-EVRM方法适用于简单的几何形状以及低粘附系数的过程,例如化学气相沉积。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号