首页> 外文期刊>Theoretical Chemistry Accounts >Relative Raman Intensities in C6H6, C6D6, and C6F6: A Comparison of Different Computational Methods
【24h】

Relative Raman Intensities in C6H6, C6D6, and C6F6: A Comparison of Different Computational Methods

机译:C6 H6 ,C6 D6 和C6 F6 中的相对拉曼强度:不同计算方法的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

The accuracy of various computational methods (Hartree–Fock, MP2, CCSD, CAS-SCF, and several types of DFT) for predicting relative intensities in Raman spectra for C6H6, C6D6, and C6F6 was compared. The predicted relative intensities for ν1 and ν2 were compared with relative intensities measured by an FT-Raman spectrometer. While none of these methods excelled at this prediction, Hartree–Fock with a large basis set was most successful for C6H6 and C6D6, while PW91PW91 was the most successful for C6F6.
机译:用于预测C6 H6 ,C6 D6拉曼光谱中相对强度的各种计算方法(Hartree-Fock,MP2,CCSD,CAS-SCF和几种DFT)的准确性和C6 F6 进行了比较。将预测的ν1和ν2相对强度与FT-拉曼光谱仪测得的相对强度进行比较。尽管这些方法都无法达到预期的效果,但具有较大基础集的Hartree-Fock对C6 H6 和C6 D6 最成功,而PW91PW91最成功对于C6 F6

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号