...
首页> 外文期刊>The RUSI journal >Questions for the Debate on the Future of the UK Strategic Deterrent
【24h】

Questions for the Debate on the Future of the UK Strategic Deterrent

机译:有关英国战略威慑未来的辩论的问题

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Continuity with existing policy maintained by successive governments and broadly endorsed by all the major political parties would suggest that the UK will continue with a national strategic deterrent. Old threats still remain, and new and unknown threats will continue to emerge. Proliferation continues, bilateral and multilateral arms control processes remain stalled and other nations are developing nuclear weapons. Yet political or economic circumstances could enforce a change of direction by a future British Government before a 'Main Gate' decision had to be taken. Assuming that a decision is taken in favour of continuity of deterrent capability, the UK will need a capability relevant to the variety of new threats. A joint programme with France is highly unlikely on the grounds of risk, cost and differing strategic outlooks. The UK cannot afford a purely indigenous programme, the costs of which are likely to be much higher than a joint programme with the US, which has already proved itself to be highly cost-effective.
机译:历届政府维持并得到所有主要政党广泛认可的现行政策的连续性,将表明英国将继续实施国家战略威慑措施。旧的威胁仍然存在,新的未知威胁将继续出现。扩散仍在继续,双边和多边军备控制进程仍然停滞不前,其他国家正在开发核武器。然而,在必须做出“大门”决定之前,政治或经济环境可能会迫使未来的英国政府改变方向。假设决定采取威慑能力的连续性,英国将需要与各种新威胁相关的能力。基于风险,成本和不同的战略前景,与法国的联合计划极不可能。英国负担不起纯粹的本土计划,其成本可能比与美国的联合计划高得多,后者已经证明自己具有很高的成本效益。

著录项

  • 来源
    《The RUSI journal》 |2005年第6期|p.50-57|共8页
  • 作者

    Lee Willett;

  • 作者单位

    Military Capabilities Programme, RUSI;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 军事;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号