首页> 外文期刊>The Review of Metaphysics >Freedom and the Human Person
【24h】

Freedom and the Human Person

机译:自由与人

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Thomas Aquinas on Created Freedom, can be usefully juxtaposed with Rist's on this point, but focuses more technically on the scholarly debate regarding the concept of will in Aquinas, for whom on Shanley's interpretation the human will is related to the possibility of evil only insofar as it is imperfect. In their interesting treatment of Locke's selective (and sometimes mischievous) use of the Christian scriptures in his polemics against Robert Filmer, Michael Zuckert et al. show that the real ground of Locke's political philosophy is always his own rational account of human freedom, never divine revelation per se. [...] while Locke is easily able to undermine the scriptural basis for Filmer's "donation doctrine" (according to which political authority derives via patriarchal conveyance from Adam), contrary to what Locke would have his reader believe, his own theory is no more scripturaily based than Filmer's.
机译:关于这一点,托马斯·阿奎那(Thomas Aquinas)可以与里斯特(Rist)并列使用,但在技术上更侧重于关于阿奎那(Aquinas)意志概念的学术辩论,在尚利(Shanley)的解释中,人的意志仅与邪恶的可能性有关。这是不完美的。迈克尔·扎克特(Michael Zuckert)等人对洛克在对罗伯特·菲尔默(Robert Filmer)的辩论中选择性地(有时是调皮的)使用基督教经文的有趣方法。这表明洛克的政治哲学的真正根源始终是他自己对人类自由的理性解释,而不是上帝本身的启示。 [...]虽然洛克很容易破坏电影人“捐赠教义”的圣经基础(根据政治权威是从亚当的父权制获得的),但洛克希望读者相信这一点,但他自己的理论并非如此比Filmer更加注重脚本。

著录项

  • 来源
    《The Review of Metaphysics》 |2011年第4期|p.885-888|共4页
  • 作者

    Joseph K Cosgrove;

  • 作者单位

    -Joseph K. Cosgrove, Providence College.;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号