首页> 外文期刊>The Police Marksman >Use-of-force and the Issue of Less Intrusive Means
【24h】

Use-of-force and the Issue of Less Intrusive Means

机译:武力的使用和较少介入手段的问题

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

A recurrent question in law enforcement circles is whether or not less intrusive means in use-of-force cases are required by law? Following is a review of some cases which have addressed this issue. From these cases it is recognized that law enforcement officers are not required by the 4th Amendment to use less intrusive means when confronted with a situation in which deadly force could justifiably be used. Accordingly, a critical issue is: either a deadly force situation exists or it does not exist under the circumstances.
机译:执法界经常问的一个问题是,法律是否要求在武力使用案件中采用较少的介入手段?以下是一些解决了此问题的案例的回顾。从这些案件中可以认识到,《第四修正案》不要求执法人员在可以合理使用致命武力的情况下使用较少干扰性的手段。因此,一个关键问题是:要么存在致命的武力情况,要么在这种情况下不存在。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号