首页> 外文期刊>Paedagogica Historica >Enacting subjectivities in educational history: methodological reflections on the use of qualitative interviews for history writing
【24h】

Enacting subjectivities in educational history: methodological reflections on the use of qualitative interviews for history writing

机译:在教育历史中确立主观性:对使用定性访谈进行历史写作的方法学思考

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Two studies of the formation of pupils' subjectivities within the Danish school and educational system in the period 1945-2005 create the framework for a methodological discussion of how subjectivities in educational history can be studied. Both studies use qualitative interviews as a way of studying subject formations in educational history. This methodological approach, however, exposes inherent methodological problems stemming from the use of sources produced in the present for studying the past. To address these problems the article will draw on poststructural ideas of subjectification and performativity developed by Judith Butler and suggest two analytical moves: A notion of time as temporality is put forward to rethink the problem of past/present in the work with memories as source material. Furthermore, the concepts of performativity and enactment are introduced to deal with the displacement of narrated subjectivities in the interviews. By this the interviewees are said to perform as memorising subjects while enacting different (memorised) subjectivities.
机译:在1945年至2005年期间,对丹麦学校和教育系统中学生的主体性形成进行了两项研究,为如何研究教育历史中的主体性建立了方法论讨论框架。两项研究都使用定性访谈作为研究教育历史中学科构成的一种方式。但是,这种方法论方法暴露了固有的方法论问题,这些问题源于使用当前产生的资源来研究过去。为了解决这些问题,本文将借鉴朱迪思·巴特勒(Judith Butler)提出的主体性和性能的后结构思想,并提出两个分析性举措:时间性的概念被提出,以记忆作为素材重新思考作品中的过去/现在问题。 。此外,引入了表演性和成文性的概念,以应对访谈中叙述主观性的转移。通过这种方式,被访者被称为在执行不同(记忆)主观的同时记住主题。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号