【24h】

Articulated dilemma

机译:明确的困境

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Most construction steelwork is designed to stay more or less where it is ― even cable structure. But as bridges have recently started to take a serious place in the architectural canon, the issue of articulated architecture is happily raised once again, once only respectable in the realms of Archigram. The two bridge designs for Bell-mouth Passage in London's Docklands, one by Birds Portchmouth Russum (BPR) and the other by Patel Taylor, demonstrate these ideas. Each was engineered by separate design teams at Techniker. Ironically, the winning Patel Taylor design was changed radically by the client and now resembles, in mechanical engineering terms at least, the BPR design, which later received first prize in the AJ/Bovis Lendlease award for the best architectural work exhibited at the 2002 Royal Academy Summer Exhibition.
机译:大多数建筑钢结构被设计成或多或少地停留在甚至是电缆结构的地方。但是,随着桥梁最近开始在建筑规范中占据重要地位,铰接式建筑的问题再次令人愉快地提出,一次仅在建筑学领域受人尊敬。伦敦港区贝尔口通道的两种桥梁设计,分别由伯德·波奇茅斯·拉斯苏姆(BPR)和帕特尔·泰勒(Patel Taylor)提出,都证明了这些想法。每个组件都是由Techniker的独立设计团队设计的。具有讽刺意味的是,获胜者Patel Taylor的设计被客户彻底改变,现在至少在机械工程学方面与BPR设计相似,BPR设计后来因在2002年皇家汽车展上展出的最佳建筑作品而获得AJ / Bovis Lendlease奖的一等奖。学院夏季展览。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号