首页> 外文期刊>The architects' journal >SHOT OUT OF AN EDUCATION SYSTEM DRUNK ON DESIGN AND QUICK-FIRE PROJECTS, WE LAND STRAIGHT INTO THE REALITIES OF PRACTICE
【24h】

SHOT OUT OF AN EDUCATION SYSTEM DRUNK ON DESIGN AND QUICK-FIRE PROJECTS, WE LAND STRAIGHT INTO THE REALITIES OF PRACTICE

机译:在设计和速战速决项目的教育体系中脱颖而出,我们直接进入实践的现实

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Leafing through a back catalogue one recent Sunday afternoon for the 40 Under 40 Awards, which celebrate promising young architects, it struck me that, with an age criterion of under 40 for the awards, architects seem to have a strange conception of the category 'young'. Not that I want anyone to take this the wrong way: we're all as young as we feel and once I approach that age limit I will be the first to say it again. But, considering that the majority of applicants are between 35 and 40, what bothers me is where that leaves all the others, like me, between the ages of 25 and 35. Where's our category? What's our title?
机译:最近一个星期日周日下午,他翻阅了后面的目录,以庆祝40名40岁以下青年建筑师,以表扬那些有前途的年轻建筑师,令我惊讶的是,鉴于该奖项的年龄标准不超过40岁,建筑师似乎对“年轻”一类的概念很陌生。 '。并不是说我希望任何人都以这种错误的方式来对待:我们都像我们所感觉的那样年轻,一旦达到这个年龄限制,我将是第一个再说一遍的人。但是,考虑到大多数申请人年龄在35至40岁之间,令我困扰的是,像我这样的所有其他人都在25至35岁之间。我们的类别在哪里?我们的名字是什么?

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号