首页> 外文期刊>Tertiary Education and Management >A Comparative Analysis of Higher Education Ranking Systems in Europe
【24h】

A Comparative Analysis of Higher Education Ranking Systems in Europe

机译:欧洲高等教育排名体系比较分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

According to Altbach in 2004, “everyone wants a world-class university”. Corresponding developmental efforts undertaken by higher education institutions are very often referenced to improvements in ranking results. Surprisingly, there is relatively little analysis of variations in higher education ranking systems across countries regarding how “world-class” is defined, measured and benchmarked. Due to the limited number of systems included in existing comparative analyses of ranking systems, it remains uncertain whether ranking results are “largely a statistical fluke” (as noted by Usher and Savino in 2006) or a reflection of “higher education systems and cultures, and the availability and reliability of data” (as noted by van Dyke in 2005). With this first comprehensive and comparative analysis of 23 higher education ranking systems published in 11 European countries, we show that certain components and characteristics of ranking systems can indeed be systematized along national boundaries. However, it also becomes obvious that no holistic distinctions can be identified between a set of rankings in a particular country in comparison to rankings in other countries.
机译:根据Altbach在2004年所说,“每个人都想要一所世界一流的大学”。高等教育机构做出的相应的发展努力通常被称为改善排名结果。令人惊讶的是,关于如何定义,衡量和衡量“世界级”的情况,各国之间对高等教育排名系统差异的分析很少。由于现有排名系统的比较分析中所包含的系统数量有限,因此尚不确定排名结果是“很大程度上是统计fl幸”(如Usher和Savino在2006年指出的那样)还是“高等教育系统和文化的体现,以及数据的可用性和可靠性”(van Dyke在2005年指出)。通过对11个欧洲国家/地区发布的23种高等教育排名系统进行的首次全面和比较分析,我们表明,排名系统的某些组成部分和特征确实可以沿国界系统化。但是,很明显,与其他国家/地区的排名相比,在特定国家/地区的一系列排名之间无法识别出整体差异。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号