首页> 外文会议>Emerging Markets Queries in Finance and Business Conference >Comparative analysis of University Education Systems from the Central and Eastern European Countries
【24h】

Comparative analysis of University Education Systems from the Central and Eastern European Countries

机译:中东欧洲国家大学教育系统的比较分析

获取原文

摘要

Worldwide higher education has witnessed over time constant changes. This changes have made the University system to be over and over reshaped and diversified. In one form or another, all educational systems of higher education have been influenced by the European educational system and perceived as a model. University system requires particular attention from the authorities, both in terms of funds and comprehensive strategy on medium and long term. For these reasons, in this paper, starting from the premises that they have similar origins, we present a study involving a comparative analysis between the average of a series of indicators at EU level, and the results reported by Poland, the Czech Republic, Hungary, Slovakia, Bulgaria and not least Romania. From one country to another university system can suffer substantial changes. If a number of European countries provide a free university system, others are leading a policy of decentralization and encourage these institutions to rely more on off-budget funds. The Bologna process was designed to create a uniform European University system, based on the same principles and characteristics and to provide the same global perspective to graduates indifferent of their country of origin. This is still far from being realized and this due to the fact that it is very hard to reorganize a university system in just a few years. We intend to analyze the countries of Eastern and South-Eastern Europe because since the Second World War, they were under a strong Soviet influence, which made the University system to develop on the same principles, mainly in coordination with the needs arising from the labor market. The main feature of the Communist regimes in all this countries is that the whole system was centralized. In accordance with the needs of the State, a series of adjacent areas were developed. For this reason, universities could not implement long-term reforms and were to 'produce' specialists in areas where the Communist Party estimated that there is a need in the future. Given the fact that these University systems relied on similar principles we intend to consider how they have developed after 1989, the reforms that have been implemented and what are the future prospects of this reforms.
机译:全球高等教育目睹了时间不断变化。这种变化使大学系统过度和过度复制和多样化。以一种形式或另一种形式,所有高等教育的教育系统都受到欧洲教育系统的影响,并被视为模型。大学系统需要特别关注当局,无论是在资金和中长期综合战略方面。由于这些原因,从本文开始,他们从他们具有相似的起源,我们提出了一项涉及欧盟水平一系列指标的平均指标的比较分析的研究,以及波兰,捷克共和国,匈牙利的结果报告的结果,斯洛伐克,保加利亚和不最少的罗马尼亚。从一个国家到另一个大学系统可以遭受重大变化。如果一些欧洲国家提供自由大学制度,其他国家正在领导权力下放政策,并鼓励这些机构更依赖于预算资金。博洛尼亚工艺旨在根据同样的原则和特点创造统一的欧洲大学系统,并提供与毕业生原籍国无动于衷的全球视角。这仍然远未实现,这是因为这一事实是在几年内很难重新组织大学系统。我们打算分析东欧和东欧国家,因为自第二次世界大战以来,他们受到强烈的苏维埃影响,这使得大学系统在同一原则上发展,主要是与劳动力所产生的需求进行协调市场。所有这些国家的共产党制度的主要特征是整个系统都集中在一起。根据国家的需求,开发了一系列邻近地区。出于这个原因,大学无法实施长期改革,并在共产党估计未来有需要的地区“生产”专家。鉴于这些大学系统依赖类似原则,我们打算考虑1989年后的发展,该改革是在实施的改革以及这一改革的未来前景。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号