首页> 外文期刊>Telematics and Informatics >Knowledge, economy, technology and society: The politics of discourse
【24h】

Knowledge, economy, technology and society: The politics of discourse

机译:知识,经济,技术和社会:话语政治

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

The WSIS is centrally interested in knowledge and has defined for itself a mission that is broadly humanitarian. Its development 'talk' is, rightly, replete with notions of equity, preserving culture, justice, human rights and so on. In incorporating such issues into knowledge society and economy discussions, WSIS has adopted a different posture towards knowledge than is seen in dominant discourses. This study analyses the dominant knowledge discourse using a large corpus of knowledge-related policy documents, discourse theory and an interrelational understanding of knowledge. I show that it is important to understand this dominant knowledge discourse because of its capacity to limit thought and action in relation to its central topic, knowledge. The results of this study demonstrate that the dominant knowledge discourse is technocratic, frequently insensitive to the humane mission at the core of the WSIS, and is based on a partial understanding of what knowledge is and how knowledge systems work. Moreover, I show that knowledge is inherently political, that the dominant knowledge discourse is politically oriented towards the concerns of business and technology, but that an emancipatory politics of knowledge is possible.
机译:信息社会世界峰会(WSIS)对知识有浓厚兴趣,并为自己定义了一个广泛的人道主义使命。它的发展“对话”正确地充满了公平,维护文化,正义,人权等概念。在将此类问题纳入知识社会和经济讨论中时,WSIS对知识的态度与主流话语中所采取的态度不同。本研究使用大量与知识相关的政策文件,话语理论和对知识的相互理解来分析主导性知识话语。我表明,理解这种占主导地位的知识话语很重要,因为它有能力限制与其核心主题知识相关的思想和行动。这项研究的结果表明,占主导地位的知识话语是技术专家制的,通常对WSIS核心的人道使命不敏感,并且基于对知识是什么以及知识系统如何工作的部分理解。此外,我证明了知识本质上是政治性的,占主导地位的知识话语在政治上针对商业和技术的关注,但是知识的解放性政治是可能的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号