首页> 外文期刊>Telematics and Informatics >INFORMATION SOCIETY OR INFORMATION ECONOMY? A CRITICAL ANALYSIS OF GERMAN INFORMATION SOCIETY POLITICS
【24h】

INFORMATION SOCIETY OR INFORMATION ECONOMY? A CRITICAL ANALYSIS OF GERMAN INFORMATION SOCIETY POLITICS

机译:信息社会还是信息经济?德国信息社会政治的批判性分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

The German government's political strategy for moving toward the information society via liberalization of telecommunications and broadcasting is completely in line with the European Commission. The information society is mainly conceived as an information economy. Although it is stressed that everybody must be able to participate, the government does not see the necessity to take any provisions besides liberalization. Public interests and civil rights are not considered as goals which need special measures to be achieved. Rather it is assumed that they will be reached by liberalization. The policy process is heavily influenced by and centered around very few large companies. In contrast to similar government programs in the past, there is no criticism by public interest groups, trade unions or the Social Democratic and the Green Party, that are traditionally expected to take care of the public interests and social concerns. They were able to put issues like universal service and public access on the agenda, but have not succeeded to bring these issues into legislation so far. The global trend of economization coincides with a process of weakening public interest institutions. This paper closes by asking whether there is still a chance for strengthening civil rights issues besides economic goals and even if there is a dominance of economic interests, whether these can be realized in the long-run without the further development of public infrastructures and a strengthened democracy.
机译:德国政府通过电信和广播自由化迈向信息社会的政治策略与欧盟委员会完全一致。信息社会主要被认为是信息经济。尽管强调每个人都必须能够参加,但政府认为除了自由化之外没有必要采取任何其他规定。公共利益和公民权利不被视为需要采取特殊措施的目标。而是假定自由化将达到这些目标。政策过程受少数大公司的影响很大,并且以少数几家大公司为中心。与过去类似的政府计划相比,传统上期望公共利益团体,工会或社会民主党和绿党没有批评,这些批评传统上是要照顾到公共利益和社会关注的。他们能够将诸如普遍服务和公众获取等问题列入议程,但迄今为止尚未成功将这些问题纳入立法。经济的全球趋势与削弱公共利益机构的过程相吻合。本文最后提出,除了经济目标以外,是否还有机会加强民权问题,即使经济利益占主导地位,如果不进一步发展公共基础设施并加强其发展,是否可以长期实现这些利益?民主。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号