首页> 外文期刊>Telecommunications Policy >Did federal regulation discourage facilities-based entry into US local telecommunications markets?
【24h】

Did federal regulation discourage facilities-based entry into US local telecommunications markets?

机译:联邦法规是否阻止基于设施的进入美国本地电信市场?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

In the United States from 2001 to 2006, federal regulations allowed entrants to lease from incumbents at relatively low cost all of the network infrastructure necessary to provide local phone service. These platform entrants could then provide phone service without installing any of their own equipment. Advocates of this policy claimed that it was needed to provide an economically feasible means by which entrants could serve residential customers. Critics contended that the policy substantially deterred loop entry whereby entrants installed their own switching equipment. An analysis of panel data for each state over this period indicates that the policy's critics may have been correct. The cross-price elasticity of loop entry with respect to platform price was roughly 1.0. A back of the envelope calculation suggests that loop entry may have decreased by roughly 20% due to platform entry price reductions.
机译:从2001年到2006年,在美国,联邦法规允许进入者以相对较低的成本向在位者租用提供本地电话服务所需的所有网络基础设施。然后,这些平台进入者无需安装任何自己的设备即可提供电话服务。这项政策的拥护者声称,有必要提供一种经济上可行的方式,使进入者可以为居民用户提供服务。批评者认为,该政策实质上阻止了环路进入,由此进入者安装了自己的交换设备。对这段时间内每个州的面板数据进行的分析表明,该政策的批评者可能是正确的。循环进入相对于平台价格的交叉价格弹性大约为1.0。信封计算的结果表明,由于平台进入价格的降低,循环进入可能已经减少了大约20%。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号