首页> 外文期刊>Technology in society >Parliamentary technology assessment institutions as indications of reflexive modernization
【24h】

Parliamentary technology assessment institutions as indications of reflexive modernization

机译:议会技术评估机构是反思性现代化的标志

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

This article links the theory of reflexive modernization to Parliamentary Technology Assessment (PTA) by considering the latter as an indication of modern Western societies becoming more reflexive, that is, acknowledging and responding to the limitations of modern traditions by institutionalizing new processes of technology assessment to address a realm of change where uncertainty is no longer contained within modern structures. Our conceptual framework must address both the emergence and functioning of PTA in the form of institutions and the practices that are pursued within (or around, and linked to) such institutions, with due attention being paid to the multiple approaches currently being debated around the transformation of modernity and reflexivity. Reflexive modernization offers a relevant theoretical approach to analyzing hybrid entities like PTA institutions. We demonstrate this by analyzing three such institutions (Science and Technology Options Assessment [STOA, European Parliament], Institute for Society and Technology [IST, Flanders, Belgium] and Rathenau Institute [The Netherlands]), mapping their different approaches and practices in terms of features of reflexive modernization. There appears to be an overall reflexivity pathway, on which some PTAs have moved farther than others, but their progress is fractured by the resilience of modern institutions. We conclude that to ensure their role in the current institutional landscapes of evolving modern societies, the most important thing for PTA institutions is therefore to somehow develop a relevant approach while dealing with the necessary margin of maneuver for further adaptation and transformation.
机译:本文将反思性现代化理论与议会技术评估(PTA)联系起来,认为后者是现代西方社会变得更加反思的指示,也就是说,通过将新的技术评估流程制度化来承认和回应现代传统的局限性。解决变化的领域,其中现代结构不再包含不确定性。我们的概念框架必须以机构的形式以及在此类机构内部(或周围以及与之相关)所追求的实践的形式,应对PTA的出现和运作,同时应适当关注当前围绕转型进行辩论的多种方法现代性和反身性。自反式现代化为分析诸如PTA机构之类的混合实体提供了一种相关的理论方法。我们通过分析这三个机构(科学技术选择评估[STOA,欧洲议会],社会与技术研究所[IST,法兰德斯,比利时]和拉特瑙研究所[荷兰])来证明这一点,并用术语描述了它们的不同方法和实践。反身现代化的特征。似乎存在一条整体的反思性路径,其中一些PTA的路径比其他PTA的路径更远,但是它们的进步却因现代机构的弹性而破裂。我们得出的结论是,要确保其在现代社会不断发展的当前机构格局中的作用,对PTA机构而言,最重要的事情是以某种方式开发一种相关的方法,同时处理为进一步适应和转型所必需的回旋余地。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Technology in society》 |2011年第2期|p.36-43|共8页
  • 作者单位

    Universite de Liege, SPIRAL, Boulevard du Rectorat 7, botte 29, B31, 4000 Liege, Belgium;

    Universite de Liege, SPIRAL, Boulevard du Rectorat 7, botte 29, B31, 4000 Liege, Belgium;

    Universite de Liege, SPIRAL, Boulevard du Rectorat 7, botte 29, B31, 4000 Liege, Belgium;

  • 收录信息 美国《工程索引》(EI);
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-17 13:07:16

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号