首页> 外文期刊>Technology in society >American technocracy and Chinese response: Theories and practices of Chinese expert politics in the period of the Nanjing Government, 1927-1949
【24h】

American technocracy and Chinese response: Theories and practices of Chinese expert politics in the period of the Nanjing Government, 1927-1949

机译:美国的技术专家制与中国的回应:南京政府时期中国专家政治的理论与实践,1927-1949年

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

This article describes the spread of the American technocracy movement in China during the 1930s and traces the appeal of a technocratic society among Chinese intellectuals. From 1931 to 1935, Chinese newspapers and magazines translated and published the writing of American technocrats, which inspired Chinese thinkers to explore technocratic ideals. This paper argues that the Nanjing Government (which operated from 1927 to 1949) upheld the Hoover and Franklin D. Roosevelt administrations as examples of expert politics in action. By studying American technocracy, China remolded American style "expert politics" into expert politics with Chinese characteristics. Although this article contends that American technocracy was the external motivating factor for the movement in China, it also establishes the uniqueness of Chinese technocracy as the merging of Chinese tradition and Western thought, and illustrates key differences between the practices of expert politics in each nation. Such divergences include the emphasis of Chinese technocrats on increasing national power and the movement's failure to change the fundamental power regime in China. The histories of both United States and China show, contra Veblen and other theorists, that technocratic governments, though powerful forces, were not able to bring about any lasting change in political structures.
机译:本文描述了1930年代美国技术官僚主义运动在中国的传播,并追溯了技术官僚主义社会对中国知识分子的吸引力。从1931年到1935年,中国报纸和杂志翻译并出版了美国技术专家的著作,这激发了中国思想家探索技术专家的理想。本文认为,南京政府(1927年至1949年运作)支持胡佛政府和富兰克林·罗斯福政府,将其作为行动中的专家政治的例子。通过研究美国的技术统治,中国将美国式的“专家政治”重塑为具有中国特色的专家政治。尽管本文认为美国技术专长是中国运动的外部动力,但它也确立了中国技术专长作为中国传统与西方思想的融合的独特性,并说明了各国专家政治实践之间的主要差异。这种分歧包括中国技术官僚强调增加国家权力,以及该运动未能改变中国的基本权力制度。与维布伦和其他理论家相反,中美两国的历史都表明,技术官僚政府尽管实力强大,却无法带来政治结构上的任何持久变化。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Technology in society》 |2015年第11期|75-85|共11页
  • 作者

    Yongmou Liu;

  • 作者单位

    Renmin University of China, School of Philosophy, No. 59 Zhongguancun Street, Haidian District, Beijing 100872, PR China;

  • 收录信息 美国《工程索引》(EI);
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

    American technocracy; Expert politics; Nanjing Government;

    机译:美国技术官僚主义;专家政治;南京市政府;
  • 入库时间 2022-08-17 13:06:46

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号