...
首页> 外文期刊>Technology analysis & strategic management >District energy development in liberalised markets: situating UK heat network development in comparison with Dutch andNorwegian case studies
【24h】

District energy development in liberalised markets: situating UK heat network development in comparison with Dutch andNorwegian case studies

机译:开放市场中的区域能源发展:将英国热网发展与荷兰和挪威的案例研究进行比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Many national energy policies envisage residual and renewable heat sources with district heating (DH) as a component of sustainable energy systems. There is however limited empirical evidence about facilitation of development in the context of liberalised markets and diminished local government control over direct service provision. Recent attempts to stimulate DH have had variable outcomes in different countries. Using five case studies, we ask why heat network development in the UK takes a relatively piecemeal and fragmented form in comparison with the Netherlands and Norway, countries whose heating sectors are comparable with the UK and where DH provision is limited. We argue that energy market liberalisation has been enacted differentially, resulting in different political and economic governance structures: in comparison with the UK liberal market economy, the more coordinated market economies of the Netherlands and Norway retain greater capacity for collaboration between energy utilities, localities and states, resulting in stronger foundations for district energy. Implications for UK governance are considered.
机译:许多国家的能源政策都设想将余热和可再生热源与区域供热(DH)作为可持续能源系统的组成部分。但是,在市场自由化和地方政府对直接服务提供的控制减弱的情况下,促进发展的经验证据有限。最近在不同国家中刺激DH的尝试产生了不同的结果。通过五个案例研究,我们要问为什么与荷兰和挪威(供热部门与英国可比且供热部门有限的国家)相比,英国的热网发展采取相对零散和分散的形式。我们认为,能源市场自由化的实施方式有所不同,导致了不同的政治和经济治理结构:与英国的自由市场经济相比,荷兰和挪威的市场经济协调性更高,在能源公用事业,地方和地方之间的协作能力更大。状态,从而为区域能源奠定了更坚实的基础。考虑了对英国治理的影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号