首页> 外文期刊>Technological forecasting and social change >READY, STEADY, DIGITAL?! How foresight activities do (NOT) affect individual technological frames for managerial SENSEMAKING
【24h】

READY, STEADY, DIGITAL?! How foresight activities do (NOT) affect individual technological frames for managerial SENSEMAKING

机译:准备好,稳定,数字?! FuSight活动如何(不)影响各个技术框架以获得管理感觉

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This qualitative study explores how managers use their individual technological frames for sensemaking during technology foresight activities. Although the positive effects of technology foresight activities are well documented, there is limited research, which analyzes the influence of foresight on managerial frames for sensemaking. We lack detailed descriptions how managers sensemaking processes are influenced, since most research studies do not analyze individual technological frames before, during, and after foresight activities are conducted. This study targets this gap by analyzing managerial frames for sensemaking at three different points in time. To do so, we conducted several technology foresight workshops with participants from the German construction sector. The collected data comprises 32 in-depth interviews, 12 group discussions, and complementary records from six companies, three organizations, and two universities. The findings show that managers apply and adapt their individual technological frames during foresight activities. Technological advantages are recognized, and the managers are able to create a detailed vision of their organization's future development. However, to our surprising, the managers returned to their initial technological frames after the workshop, because the daily business life and established routines did not allow to apply the adapted sensemaking mechanisms. The study's findings offer three contribution: First, we show that managers distinguish their sensemaking in perceived sensegiving and sensebreaking during foresight activities. Second, we describe the gravitating influence of a dominating organizational frame, which leads managers to ignore the results of foresight activities. Third, we question the long-term interrelations of foresight activities and technological frames.
机译:这种定性研究探讨了经理在技术前瞻性活动期间如何使用各自的技术框架进行传感。虽然技术远见活动的积极影响有限,但研究有限,分析了对远见的影响对敏感的管理框架。我们缺乏详细的描述,管理员传感过程如何受到影响,因为大多数研究研究未在进行远见活动之前,期间和之后的个人技术框架。本研究通过分析在三种不同点的激发管理框架来实现这种差距。为此,我们与来自德国建筑业的参与者进行了几位技术前瞻性研讨会。收集的数据包括32个深入的访谈,12个集团讨论和六家公司,三个组织和两个大学的互补记录。调查结果表明,管理人员在远见活动期间适用和调整各个技术框架。认可技术优势,管理人员能够创建组织未来发展的详细愿景。然而,对于我们令人惊讶的是,经理在研讨会之后返回其初始技术框架,因为日常商业生活和成立的惯例不允许应用适应的传感机制。该研究的调查结果提供了三项贡献:首先,我们表明管理人员在远见活动期间在感知的感官和感应方面区分他们的传感。其次,我们描述了主导组织框架的引力影响,这使得管理人员忽视了远见活动的结果。第三,我们质疑远见活动和技术框架的长期相互关系。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号