首页> 外文期刊>Technological forecasting and social change >An institutional analysis of technological learning in Iran's oil and gas industry: Case study of south Pars gas field development
【24h】

An institutional analysis of technological learning in Iran's oil and gas industry: Case study of south Pars gas field development

机译:伊朗石油和天然气行业技术学习的制度分析:以南帕尔斯气田开发为例

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This aim of this study is to identify elements in the institutional setting which affect technological learning outcomes in large socio technical systems. By drawing on fieldwork and empirical evidence from Iran's oil and gas industry, a multiple-case study has been conducted. It is found that the institutional regime of this sector jeopardizes technological learning scenarios through 4 overarching aspects: Cost, Time, Risk and Management structure, which we call "the CTRM square". It is also revealed that the locked-in institutional structure of the sector creates a "negative co-evolution" among actors leading to impairment of technological learning. Our data shows that the characteristics of large socio-technical regimes in developing countries act in favour of such impairment. These regimes create strong commitment in stakeholder groups. Such commitment establishes dominancy around technological routines, which is the result of low absorptive capacity of stakeholders and their lack of awareness regarding new technological scenarios. In some cases, political conditions surrounding a project as well as personal gains lead to the stakeholder's deliberate action against a new technological scenario. The negative co-evolution contributes to the supply side change of strategy in order to safeguard their market position which ultimately engenders dominancy of obsolete technological routines in the firms diminishing technological learning in the oil and gas industry. (C) 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
机译:这项研究的目的是确定制度环境中影响大型社会技术系统中技术学习成果的要素。通过利用来自伊朗石油和天然气行业的实地调查和经验证据,进行了多案例研究。发现该部门的制度体制通过四个总体方面危害了技术学习方案:成本,时间,风险和管理结构,我们称之为“ CTRM广场”。还揭示出,该部门固定的体制结构在参与者之间造成了“负共同进化”,从而导致技术学习受到损害。我们的数据表明,发展中国家大型社会技术制度的特征有助于这种损害。这些制度在利益相关者团体中建立了坚定的承诺。此类承诺在技术例程周围建立了支配地位,这是由于利益相关者的吸收能力低以及他们对新技术场景缺乏了解而导致的。在某些情况下,围绕项目的政治条件以及个人收益会导致利益相关者针对新的技术方案采取故意行动。负面的协同进化有助于战略的供应方改变,以维护其市场地位,最终导致企业中过时的技术惯例处于支配地位,从而削弱了石油和天然气行业的技术学习能力。 (C)2015 Elsevier Inc.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号