首页> 外文期刊>Team Performance Management >Examining teamwork and leadership in the fields of public administration, leadership, and management
【24h】

Examining teamwork and leadership in the fields of public administration, leadership, and management

机译:检查公共管理,领导力和管理领域的团队合作和领导能力

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to provide a systematic review of papers in ten top scholarly journals to determine their overall examination of leadership in teams and to identify which models of teamwork and leadership have been most explored by researchers. Design/methodology/approach - This paper reaches its findings through content analysis of 80 journal papers published in top academic journals from 1999 through 2012. Coding based on categories of teams, leadership and leadership styles conformed to forced choice and latent coding; two independent reviewers managed the subjectivity of the coding. Findings - Sixty per cent of the papers studied explored a group of workers whose teamwork was expected to be permanent, which receives a strong direction from a designated leader; almost that many (58.75 per cent) explored a group working with formal leadership by the worker's supervisor; almost 50 per cent of papers explored leadership that' combined two or more leadership styles simultaneously. This heavy concentration of the literature in a few areas suggests that research on other types of teamwork and leadership is minimal. Research limitations/implications - This particular research utilized the latent coding method of content analysis and forced choice in the selections. Even though content analysis has many strengths, the latent coding method of content analysis and forced choice selections require the researcher to examine the overall content to determine whether certain variables were present or absent. After the examination of the overall content, a subjective interpretation of the data is needed from the researcher. Other researchers that look at the same data may interpret the data differently. Practical implications - This research provides researchers, academics and practitioners with a comprehensive analysis on teamwork and leadership. The extensive investigation presents a pivotal starting point for further developments in this emerging area. The content analysis found a proliferation of diverse organizations utilizing teamwork, and this subject should be researched more vigorously. As organizations continue to embrace, pursue and promote teamwork, understanding the current state of the field will assist in having better understanding on how to develop effective teams. Originality/value - This paper contributes to the field by creating taxonomy to categorize the types of leaders and teams and presenting an explanation on the distinction between traditional and horizontal style of leadership. In identifying major trends in the existent literature, this examination provides valuable information for researchers.
机译:目的-本文的目的是对十种顶级学术期刊的论文进行系统的综述,以确定他们对团队领导力的整体检查,并确定研究人员最探索的团队合作和领导力模式。设计/方法/方法-本文通过对1999年至2012年在顶级学术期刊上发表的80篇论文进行内容分析来得出其发现。基于团队类别,领导和领导风格的编码与强迫选择和潜在编码相符;两名独立的审阅者管理编码的主观性。调查结果-研究的论文中有60%探索了一群工人,他们的团队合作预期将是永久的,并得到了指定领导的大力指导;几乎有许多人(58.75%)探索了一个由工人主管监督并在正式领导下工作的小组;几乎50%的论文探索了将两种或多种领导风格同时结合的领导能力。大量文献集中在几个领域,这表明对其他类型的团队合作和领导力的研究很少。研究的局限性/意义-这项特定的研究利用了内容分析的潜在编码方法,并在选择中进行了强制选择。即使内容分析有很多优点,内容分析和强制选择选择的潜在编码方法也要求研究人员检查总体内容,以确定是否存在某些变量。在检查了总体内容之后,需要研究者对数据进行主观解释。查看相同数据的其他研究人员可能对数据有不同的解释。实际意义-这项研究为研究人员,学者和从业人员提供了有关团队合作和领导能力的全面分析。广泛的研究为该新兴领域的进一步发展提供了关键的起点。内容分析发现,利用团队合作的各种组织激增,应该对此问题进行更加有力的研究。随着组织继续拥抱,追求和促进团队合作,了解该领域的当前状况将有助于更好地了解如何建立有效的团队。原创性/价值-本文通过创建分类法来对领导者和团队的类型进行分类,并对传统和横向领导风格之间的区别做出解释,从而为该领域做出了贡献。在确定现有文献中的主要趋势时,这项检查为研究人员提供了有价值的信息。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号