首页> 外文期刊>Synthese >Carnap on theoretical terms: structuralism without metaphysics
【24h】

Carnap on theoretical terms: structuralism without metaphysics

机译:在理论上陷入困境:没有形而上学的结构主义

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Both realists and instrumentalists have found it difficult to understand (much less accept) Carnap’s developed view on theoretical terms, which attempts to stake out a neutral position between realism and instrumentalism. I argue that Carnap’s mature conception of a scientific theory as the conjunction of its Ramsey sentence and Carnap sentence can indeed achieve this neutral position. To see this, however, we need to see why the Newman problem raised in the context of recent work on structural realism is no problem for Carnap’s conception; and we also need to locate Carnap’s work on theoretical terms within his wider program of Wissenschaftslogik or the logic of science.
机译:现实主义者和工具主义者都发现很难理解(更不用说接受了)卡尔纳普关于理论术语的发达观点,这种观点试图在现实主义和工具主义之间确立中立的立场。我认为,卡纳普(Carnap)作为拉姆西(Ramsey)句子和卡纳普(Carnap)句子相结合的科学理论的成熟概念确实可以实现这一中立立场。但是,要了解这一点,我们需要了解为什么在最近关于结构现实主义的研究中提出的纽曼问题对卡纳普的构想来说不是问题。而且我们还需要根据卡尔纳普在Wissenschaftslogik的更广泛计划或科学逻辑中的理论术语来开展研究。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号