首页> 外文期刊>Sustainability science >Understanding mechanisms of conflict resolution beyond collaboration: an interdisciplinary typology of knowledge types and their integration in practice
【24h】

Understanding mechanisms of conflict resolution beyond collaboration: an interdisciplinary typology of knowledge types and their integration in practice

机译:了解协作以外的冲突解决机制:知识类型的跨学科类型及其在实践中的整合

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Conflicts over land use and their resolution are one of the core challenges in reaching sustainable development today. The aim of this paper is to better understand the mechanisms that underlie conflict resolution. To do so we focus on the use and integration of different knowledge types for conflict resolution in three fields: natural resource management, transdisciplinary research and urban planning. We seek to understand what role different types of knowledge have in the different examples and contexts given. How is knowledge conceptualized and defined? How is it used and integrated to resolve conflicts? These questions are answered through a thematic review of the literature and a discussion of the different knowledge typologies from the respective research fields. We compare conflict resolution approaches and, as a synthesis, present an interdisciplinary knowledge typology for conflict resolution. We find that knowledge use centered approaches are seen as facilitating a common understanding of a problem and creating a necessary base for more productive collaboration across disciplines. However, it is often unclear what knowledge means in the studies analyzed. More attention to the role that different knowledge types have in conflict resolution is needed in order to shed more light on the possible shortcomings of the resolution processes. This might serve as a base to improve conflict resolution towards more lasting, long-term oriented and therefore more sustainable solutions. We conclude that the three literatures inform and enrich each other across disciplinary boundaries and can be used to develop more refined approaches to understanding knowledge use in conflict analysis and resolution.
机译:关于土地使用的冲突及其解决办法是当今实现可持续发展的核心挑战之一。本文的目的是更好地理解解决冲突的机制。为此,我们专注于使用和整合不同知识类型来解决三个领域的冲突:自然资源管理,跨学科研究和城市规划。我们试图了解不同类型的知识在给出的不同示例和上下文中所起的作用。知识如何概念化和定义?如何使用和整合它来解决冲突?通过对文献进行主题回顾以及对各个研究领域不同知识类型的讨论,可以回答这些问题。我们比较了解决冲突的方法,并作为综合提出了解决冲突的跨学科知识类型。我们发现,以知识使用为中心的方法被视为促进了对问题的共识,并为跨学科的更有成效的协作创造了必要的基础。但是,通常不清楚知识在所分析的研究中意味着什么。需要更多地关注不同知识类型在解决冲突中的作用,以便更多地了解解决过程的可能缺点。这可能是改善冲突解决方案的基础,以便朝着更持久,更长期,因此更可持续的解决方案发展。我们得出的结论是,这三篇文献跨越学科界限互相交流和充实,可以用来发展更完善的方法来理解冲突分析和解决中知识的使用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号