...
首页> 外文期刊>Surgical infections >Selection of Prophylactic Antimicrobial Agent May Affect Incidence of Infection in Small Bowel and Colorectal Surgery
【24h】

Selection of Prophylactic Antimicrobial Agent May Affect Incidence of Infection in Small Bowel and Colorectal Surgery

机译:预防性抗菌药物的选择可能会影响小肠​​和结直肠手术感染的发生率

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Background: Antibiotic prophylaxis guidelines suggest single-dose regimens are adequate, but comparisons of multiple agents are lacking. We compared post-operative infection rates retrospectively among six common prophylactic agents given as a single dose to colorectal surgery patients. Methods: A commercial database supplied demographics, All-Patient Refined Diagnosis-Related Groups (APR DRGs), International Classification of Disease (ICD)-9 codes, and drug utilization information for patients discharged from 303 hospitals from January 2007-December 2008 whose charts had been sampled for reporting Surgical Care Improvement Project (SCIP) measures. The patients (n=4,634) had the same APR DRG, no baseline infection, and prophylaxis discontinued within 24 h of surgery. Development of infection was determined by ICD-9 code. "Single dose" was defined as ≤3g of ampicillin-sulbactam (AMP); ≤2g of cefotetan (CFT), cefoxitin (FOX), or ertapenem (ERT); or metronidazole and ≤2g of cefazolin (CFZ) or ≤750mg of levofloxacin (LVX) given on the day of the procedure. Multivariable logistic regression evaluated factors associated with infection, including agent choice. Results: Frequency of use and rate of infection (3.7% overall) were FOX 1,752 (4.9%), ERT 1,166 (2.7%), CFZ 549 (2.7%), AMP 447 (3.6%), LVX 402 (3.2%), and CFT 318 (3.5%). The unadjusted infection rate differed by agent (p = 0.037). Multiple regression analysis found infection to be associated significantly with increasing APR DRG severity, longer procedures, younger age, and male gender (p < 0.01 for each except p = 0.02 for age), as well as agent choice. Among agents (vs. FOX as reference), ERT was associated with a lower infection rate (odds ratio 0.53; 95% confidence interval 0.34-0.82; p<0.01); the odds ratio for all other agents contained the value 1.0. Conclusions: Agent selection among prophylactic antibiotics is one of many factors associated with infection development in colorectal surgery patients.
机译:背景:抗生素预防指南建议单剂量方案是适当的,但缺乏多种药物的比较。我们回顾性比较了大肠手术患者单次使用的六种常见预防药物的术后感染率。方法:从2007年1月至2008年12月从303所医院出院的患者提供的人口统计资料,全功能精细诊断相关人群(APR DRG),国际疾病分类(ICD)-9代码以及药物利用信息,该数据库已被抽样用于报告外科护理改善项目(SCIP)措施。患者(n = 4,634)具有相同的APR DRG,无基线感染,并且在手术后24小时内停止了预防。通过ICD-9代码确定感染的发展。 “单剂量”定义为≤3g氨苄西林舒巴坦(AMP); ≤2克头孢替坦(CFT),头孢西丁(FOX)或厄他培南(ERT);或当日甲硝唑和≤2g的头孢唑林(CFZ)或≤750mg的左氧氟沙星(LVX)。多变量逻辑回归评估与感染相关的因素,包括药物选择。结果:使用频率和感染率(总体为3.7%)为FOX 1,752(4.9%),ERT 1,166(2.7%),CFZ 549(2.7%),AMP 447(3.6%),LVX 402(3.2%), CFT 318(3.5%)。未经调整的感染率因病原体而异(p = 0.037)。多元回归分析发现,感染与APR DRG严重程度增加,手术时间更长,年龄较小和男性(除年龄p = 0.02,每个p <0.01)有关,并且与药物选择密切相关。在病原体中(以FOX为参照),ERT与较低的感染率相关(几率0.53; 95%置信区间0.34-0.82; p <0.01);所有其他代理的优势比包含值1.0。结论:预防性抗生素的选择是大肠手术患者感染发展的许多因素之一。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Surgical infections》 |2011年第6期|p.451-457|共7页
  • 作者单位

    Center for Anti-Infective Research and Development Hartford Hospital 80 Seymour St. Hartford, CT 06102;

    rnCenter for Anti-Infective Research and Development , Hartford Hospital, Hartford, Connecticut,Division of Infectious Diseases, Hartford Hospital, Hartford, Connecticut;

  • 收录信息 美国《化学文摘》(CA);
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号